[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] [$450mm](/topic/$450mm) ### Top Social Posts *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "@TheAstrosLocker And then what We offer 6yrs/$150mm; they counter with 10yrs/$450mm. Skubal walks at the end of the year & we get a 3rd round pick. We turn that pick into a "toolsy" HS SS who X yrs later is promoted to the MLB club & K's XX times during his 1st XXX ABs No thanks" [X Link](https://x.com/hayton_loyd/status/1979195617097257060) [@hayton_loyd](/creator/x/hayton_loyd) 2025-10-17T14:39Z X followers, XXX engagements "The IRR math you use doesn't make sense. You are trying to calculate an equity IRR on the $429mm of equity put into the "deal" and decide if that IRR is above cost of equity capital so yes as Coreweave models there is no "cost of equity" subtracted from cash flows. Your math subtracts $43mm in years 1-3 then $450mm in years X as "cost of equity" - who is that being paid out to exactly when Coreweave (the "equity holder") has already put in $429mm that can be financed by selling shares etc You remove that one assumption which doesn't make sense and on your #s the equity IRR is XX% on the deal" [X Link](https://x.com/Giga292/status/1967666280284229966) [@Giga292](/creator/x/Giga292) 2025-09-15T19:06Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"@TheAstrosLocker And then what We offer 6yrs/$150mm; they counter with 10yrs/$450mm. Skubal walks at the end of the year & we get a 3rd round pick. We turn that pick into a "toolsy" HS SS who X yrs later is promoted to the MLB club & K's XX times during his 1st XXX ABs No thanks"
X Link @hayton_loyd 2025-10-17T14:39Z X followers, XXX engagements
"The IRR math you use doesn't make sense. You are trying to calculate an equity IRR on the $429mm of equity put into the "deal" and decide if that IRR is above cost of equity capital so yes as Coreweave models there is no "cost of equity" subtracted from cash flows. Your math subtracts $43mm in years 1-3 then $450mm in years X as "cost of equity" - who is that being paid out to exactly when Coreweave (the "equity holder") has already put in $429mm that can be financed by selling shares etc You remove that one assumption which doesn't make sense and on your #s the equity IRR is XX% on the deal"
X Link @Giga292 2025-09-15T19:06Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
/topic/$450mm/posts