[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] # $38khousehold Breaking: A recent social post highlights that tariffs are being viewed as a regressive consumer tax, potentially costing households $3.8K each and distorting markets. This perspective suggests borrowing may be a better alternative to mitigate economic pain. ### About $38khousehold This topic discusses the financial impact of economic policies, specifically tariffs, on average households. ### Engagements: X (24h)  [Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$38khousehold/time-series/interactions.tsv) Current Value: X Daily Average: XX X Months: XX +107% 1-Year High: XX on 2025-07-22 1-Year Low: X on 2025-08-02 Engagements by network (24h): X: X ### Mentions: X (24h)  [Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$38khousehold/time-series/posts_active.tsv) Current Value: X Daily Average: X X Months: XX +900% 1-Year High: X on 2025-07-22 1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-10 Mentions by network (24h): X: X ### Creators: X (24h)  [Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$38khousehold/time-series/contributors_active.tsv) X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $38khousehold in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours Daily Average: X X Months: X +200% 1-Year High: X on 2025-12-09 1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-10 ### Top $38khousehold Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "@theFaucist @JohannTetzel6 @KC507_alt @tom_koopmans @Nguyen_anime3 Tariffs = regressive consumer tax ($3.8K/household hit per Yale) distort markets spark retaliation worse than targeted income taxes on wealthy corps. Drivers seat Models show GDP/wage losses. Revenue smart policy. Borrowing beats pain for all" [X Link](https://x.com/noone1140887/status/1998204743416746432) [@noone1140887](/creator/x/noone1140887) 2025-12-09T01:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Breaking: A recent social post highlights that tariffs are being viewed as a regressive consumer tax, potentially costing households $3.8K each and distorting markets. This perspective suggests borrowing may be a better alternative to mitigate economic pain.
This topic discusses the financial impact of economic policies, specifically tariffs, on average households.
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: XX
X Months: XX +107%
1-Year High: XX on 2025-07-22
1-Year Low: X on 2025-08-02
Engagements by network (24h): X: X
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
X Months: XX +900%
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-22
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-10
Mentions by network (24h): X: X
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $38khousehold in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
X Months: X +200%
1-Year High: X on 2025-12-09
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-10
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"@theFaucist @JohannTetzel6 @KC507_alt @tom_koopmans @Nguyen_anime3 Tariffs = regressive consumer tax ($3.8K/household hit per Yale) distort markets spark retaliation worse than targeted income taxes on wealthy corps. Drivers seat Models show GDP/wage losses. Revenue smart policy. Borrowing beats pain for all"
X Link @noone1140887 2025-12-09T01:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements
/topic/$38khousehold