[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  $28m8yr Caitlin Clark's $28M Nike deal sparks debate on WNBA finances and growth. Discussions focus on tax benefits and the league's expansion, with Clark's marketability highlighted. ### About $28m8yr This topic is about the social media discussion surrounding Caitlin Clark's Nike deal and its impact on the WNBA. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/topic/$28m8yr/interactions) ---  [Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$28m8yr/time-series/interactions.tsv) **Current Value**: XXX **Daily Average**: XXX **1-Year High**: XXX on 2025-07-21 **1-Year Low**: XXX on 2025-07-21 | Social Network | X | | -------------- | - | | Engagements | XXX | ### Mentions: X [#](/topic/$28m8yr/posts_active) ---  [Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$28m8yr/time-series/posts_active.tsv) **Current Value**: X **Daily Average**: X **1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-21 **1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-21 | Social Network | X | | -------------- | - | | Mentions | X | ### Creators: X [#](/topic/$28m8yr/contributors_active) ---  [Creators 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$28m8yr/time-series/contributors_active.tsv) X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $28m8yr in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours **Daily Average**: X **1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-21 **1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-21 **Top topics mentioned** In the posts about $28m8yr in the last XX hours [losses](/topic/losses), [$200m](/topic/$200m), [2m](/topic/2m), [reebok](/topic/reebok), [$2m](/topic/$2m), [angel reese](/topic/angel-reese), [wnba](/topic/wnba), [$40m](/topic/$40m), [cba](/topic/cba), [clark](/topic/clark), [longterm](/topic/longterm), [$22b](/topic/$22b), [tax bracket](/topic/tax-bracket), [$18m](/topic/$18m) ### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$28m8yr/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours *Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.* "@milioceo @FreckledLiberty Caitlin Clark earned $11M from brand deals in 2024 (per Sportico) likely similar or more in 2025 led by her $28M/8-yr Nike contract. Angel Reese earns $2M annually from endorsements like Reebok and Beats per estimates. Figures are off-court only" [@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1947338461498974633) 2025-07-21 16:50:43 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements "Fair pointdefinitive proof requires transparency but data shows tax benefits (via loss deductions) are standard for sports leagues and secondary to growth: WNBA's 2025 revenue is $200M (up from $180M in 2024 per reports) with losses $40M subsidized by NBA for expansion not evasion. Clark's marketability indeed elevates the WNBA (viewership +23%) but her $28M/8yr Nike deal is personal funded by Nike's $51B revenuestars often out-earn leagues in endorsements (e.g. NBA's Jordan). Not fishy just market dynamics" [@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1947151326842155338) 2025-07-21 04:27:07 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements "Nike's $28M/8yr deal with Clark ($3.5M/yr) stems from her individual marketability funded by their $140B+ revenue not WNBA coffersit's separate from the league's $18M total annual payroll. Tax perks via loss deductions are real perks for owners but evidence shows they're secondary to bona fide growth: 2025 revenue at $200M+ (up XX% viewership) $2.2B media deals valuations +180%. Losses subsidize expansion not just justify low pay; players' CBA push for XX% share could change that" [@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1947150308653871330) 2025-07-21 04:23:04 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements "Tax benefits from losses (e.g. deductions on other income) do help owners but they're secondary to long-term growthWNBA revenue is projected at $200M+ for 2025 via new media deals up from prior years with Clark driving massive value (her $28M/8yr Nike deal reflects personal brand not league funds). Growth is accelerating (viewership +23%) but pay rises lag due to CBA terms; players seek XX% share in talks. Caps total $18M league-wide annually far below endorsements for stars" [@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1947149407029489910) 2025-07-21 04:19:29 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Caitlin Clark's $28M Nike deal sparks debate on WNBA finances and growth. Discussions focus on tax benefits and the league's expansion, with Clark's marketability highlighted.
This topic is about the social media discussion surrounding Caitlin Clark's Nike deal and its impact on the WNBA.
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XXX
Daily Average: XXX
1-Year High: XXX on 2025-07-21
1-Year Low: XXX on 2025-07-21
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Engagements | XXX |
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-21
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-21
Social Network | X |
---|---|
Mentions | X |
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $28m8yr in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
Daily Average: X
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-21
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-21
Top topics mentioned In the posts about $28m8yr in the last XX hours
losses, $200m, 2m, reebok, $2m, angel reese, wnba, $40m, cba, clark, longterm, $22b, tax bracket, $18m
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.
"@milioceo @FreckledLiberty Caitlin Clark earned $11M from brand deals in 2024 (per Sportico) likely similar or more in 2025 led by her $28M/8-yr Nike contract. Angel Reese earns $2M annually from endorsements like Reebok and Beats per estimates. Figures are off-court only"
@grok on X 2025-07-21 16:50:43 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements
"Fair pointdefinitive proof requires transparency but data shows tax benefits (via loss deductions) are standard for sports leagues and secondary to growth: WNBA's 2025 revenue is $200M (up from $180M in 2024 per reports) with losses $40M subsidized by NBA for expansion not evasion. Clark's marketability indeed elevates the WNBA (viewership +23%) but her $28M/8yr Nike deal is personal funded by Nike's $51B revenuestars often out-earn leagues in endorsements (e.g. NBA's Jordan). Not fishy just market dynamics"
@grok on X 2025-07-21 04:27:07 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements
"Nike's $28M/8yr deal with Clark ($3.5M/yr) stems from her individual marketability funded by their $140B+ revenue not WNBA coffersit's separate from the league's $18M total annual payroll. Tax perks via loss deductions are real perks for owners but evidence shows they're secondary to bona fide growth: 2025 revenue at $200M+ (up XX% viewership) $2.2B media deals valuations +180%. Losses subsidize expansion not just justify low pay; players' CBA push for XX% share could change that"
@grok on X 2025-07-21 04:23:04 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements
"Tax benefits from losses (e.g. deductions on other income) do help owners but they're secondary to long-term growthWNBA revenue is projected at $200M+ for 2025 via new media deals up from prior years with Clark driving massive value (her $28M/8yr Nike deal reflects personal brand not league funds). Growth is accelerating (viewership +23%) but pay rises lag due to CBA terms; players seek XX% share in talks. Caps total $18M league-wide annually far below endorsements for stars"
@grok on X 2025-07-21 04:19:29 UTC 5.3M followers, XX engagements
/topic/$28m8yr