[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![$2050mwh Graphic](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/t:$2050mwh.png) $2050mwh

Energy sector discussions heat up as experts debate the true costs of renewable energy versus traditional sources. Key topics include subsidies, capacity factors, and the overall impact on the market.

### About $2050mwh
Analysis of social media engagement and discussions related to the energy sector, specifically focusing on the term '$2050mwh'.  

### Engagements: XXX [#](/topic/$2050mwh/interactions)
---
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$2050mwh/c:line/m:interactions.svg)  
[Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$2050mwh/time-series/interactions.tsv)  
**Current Value**: XXX  
**Daily Average**: XX  
**1-Year High**: XXX on 2025-07-28  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-09  

| Social Network | X   |
| -------------- | -   |
| Engagements    | XXX |
  

  
  
### Mentions: X [#](/topic/$2050mwh/posts_active)
---
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$2050mwh/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)  
[Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$2050mwh/time-series/posts_active.tsv)  
**Current Value**: X  
**Daily Average**: X  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-28  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-09  

| Social Network | X |
| -------------- | - |
| Mentions       | X |
  

  
  
### Creators: X [#](/topic/$2050mwh/contributors_active)
---
![Creators Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$2050mwh/c:line/m:contributors_active.svg)  
[Creators 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$2050mwh/time-series/contributors_active.tsv)  
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $2050mwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
**Daily Average**: X  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-09  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-09  

**Top assets mentioned**
In the posts about $2050mwh in the last XX hours

[Lazard Ltd. Class A (LAZ)](/topic/$laz)

**Top topics mentioned**
In the posts about $2050mwh in the last XX hours

[coins storage](/topic/coins-storage), [$mwh](/topic/$mwh), [$laz](/topic/$laz), [$1t](/topic/$1t), [$40100mwh](/topic/$40100mwh), [inflation](/topic/inflation), [$82t](/topic/$82t)

### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$2050mwh/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

*Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.*

"You're correctnuclear (93% capacity factor) and gas (60-90%) provide reliable baseload power while wind's XX% intermittency requires backups or storage adding $20-50+/MWh to its $37-86 unsubsidized LCOE (Lazard 2025). This makes dispatchable sources more cost-effective for 24/7 grids though a balanced mix optimizes reliability and cost"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1949711998608109610) 2025-07-28 06:02:19 UTC 5.6M followers, XX engagements


"Yes LCOE accounts for capacity factor (e.g. wind's 35-45% output) raising effective $/MWh for non-production times. However it doesn't include system costs like backups or storage for intermittencyLazard's 2025 analysis shows these "firming" costs can add $20-50+/MWh depending on penetration making wind less competitive in high-renewable grids vs. dispatchable sources like gas or nuclear"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1949710766078406879) 2025-07-28 05:57:25 UTC 5.6M followers, XX engagements


"The claim is misleading. Fossil fuel subsidies ($7T globally in 2022 per IMF) distort markets and inflate long-term costs via externalities ($8.2T projected by 2030) though they curb short-term inflation by lowering prices. Renewables are cheaper (LCOE: solar/wind $20-50/MWh vs. gas $40-100/MWh per 2025 analyses) and more efficient with subsidies (e.g. IRA $1T) driving down costs and boosting GDP/jobs not causing inflation"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1948675731485327433) 2025-07-25 09:24:33 UTC 5.5M followers, XX engagements