# $178k California's 'jock tax' is under scrutiny as athletes face significant tax bills on Super Bowl winnings, sparking debate about state tax policies for high earners. Discussions highlight potential tax revenue for California versus the financial impact on athletes. ### About $178k This topic pertains to the cryptocurrency market, focusing on digital assets and blockchain technology. ### Insights - $178k Creators hit a 52-Week high of [---] for the day - $178k Creators hit an all time of [---] for the day - $178k Mentions hit a 52-Week high of [---] for the day - $178k Mentions hit an all time of [---] for the day - $178k Engagements hit a 52-Week high of [---------] for the day ### Engagements: [------] (24h)  [Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$178k/time-series/interactions.tsv) Current Value: [------] Daily Average: [------] [--] Month: [---------] +2,549% [--] Months: [---------] +87% [--] Year: [---------] -34% 1-Year High: [---------] on 2026-02-08 1-Year Low: [---] on 2025-06-12 Engagements by network (24h): News: [--] X: [------] YouTube: [---] Reddit: [---] TikTok: [-----] ### Mentions: [---] (24h)  [Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$178k/time-series/posts_active.tsv) Current Value: [---] Daily Average: [--] 1-Year High: [---] on 2026-02-11 1-Year Low: [--] on 2025-06-15 Mentions by network (24h): News: [--] X: [---] YouTube: [--] Reddit: [--] TikTok: [--] ### Creators: [---] (24h)  [Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$178k/time-series/contributors_active.tsv) [---] unique social accounts have posts mentioning $178k in the last [--] hours which is down 18% from [---] in the previous [--] hours Daily Average: [--] 1-Year High: [---] on 2026-02-11 1-Year Low: [--] on 2025-06-13 The most influential creators that mention $178k in the last [--] hours | Creator | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements | | ------- | ---- | --------- | ----- | ----------- | | [@grok](/creator/twitter/grok) | [--] | [---------] | [--] | [-----] | | [@joshrauh](/creator/twitter/joshrauh) | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [---] | | [@Carlisechin](/creator/twitter/Carlisechin) | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [---] | | [@alwaystradeback](/creator/twitter/alwaystradeback) | [--] | [--] | [--] | [--] | | [@AlphaWhalesX](/creator/twitter/AlphaWhalesX) | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [--] | [View More](/list/creators/$178k/100) ### Sentiment: 88%  [Sentiment 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data](/topic/$178k/time-series/sentiment.tsv) Current Value: 88% Daily Average: 89% [--] Month: 86% +4% [--] Months: 86% -14% [--] Year: 86% +46% 1-Year High: 100% on 2025-02-20 1-Year Low: 15% on 2025-12-15 Most Supportive Themes: - Bitcoin Price Targets: (40%) Discussions around potential upward price movements for Bitcoin, with specific targets mentioned. - Altcoin Investment Opportunities: (40%) Discussions around smaller altcoins with low market caps, highlighting potential for growth. Most Critical Themes: - Real Estate Development Costs: (20%) Concerns raised about increasing development costs in the real estate sector, impacting housing prices. ### Top $178k Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours *Showing a maximum of [--] top social posts without a LunarCrush subscription.* "You're rightthe jock tax applies to the portion of a player's total income (salary + bonuses) allocated to CA duty days not just the $178K Super Bowl bonus. For Darnold ($27.5M [----] earnings est. 8-10 CA days out of 200) CA tax at 14.4% on $1.1M-1.4M apportioned could be $160K-200K exceeding the bonus but a small fraction of his overall pay. It's net positive yearly like taxes on daily wages. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021869611281445163 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021869611281445163" [X Link](https://x.com/grok/status/2021869611281445163) [@grok](/creator/x/grok) 2026-02-12T08:50Z 7.9M followers, [---] engagements "@Atom49Adam @NFL_DovKleiman Yes for high-earning players like Sam Darnold California's jock tax on income apportioned to Super Bowl duty days can exceed the $178K winner's bonus. Estimates show he owed $200K-$249K netting a loss. This varies by salary and assumptions" [X Link](https://x.com/grok/status/2021796886890344833) [@grok](/creator/x/grok) 2026-02-12T04:01Z 7.9M followers, [----] engagements "All future Super Bowls should be played in states that have no stupid taxes like this. NRG Stadium in Houston Texas or Ray J Stadium in Tampa Bay Florida. SB61 will be played in SoFi which is also in California meaning that whoever wins it there next year will be subjected to this stupid tax again 🙄😒 Californias jock taxes force pro athletes who dont live in the state to fork over percentages of their yearly income based on the number of days they work in California. Darnold received $178k for winning the Super Bowl He owes California $249k. https://t.co/H4ktH8E1Te Californias jock taxes" [X Link](https://x.com/TXTanoStan99/status/2021791440527843480) [@TXTanoStan99](/creator/x/TXTanoStan99) 2026-02-12T03:40Z [----] followers, [---] engagements "The $249K isn't just taxes on the $178K Super Bowl bonusit's California's estimated tax on the pro-rated share of Sam Darnold's full $33M annual salary for the [--] "duty days" spent in the state (practices game) under jock tax rules for non-residents. His total income portion taxed by CA pushes it higher than the bonus alone. Net he owes about $71K more" [X Link](https://x.com/grok/status/2021724618151649657) [@grok](/creator/x/grok) 2026-02-11T23:14Z 7.9M followers, [---] engagements Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing
California's 'jock tax' is under scrutiny as athletes face significant tax bills on Super Bowl winnings, sparking debate about state tax policies for high earners. Discussions highlight potential tax revenue for California versus the financial impact on athletes.
This topic pertains to the cryptocurrency market, focusing on digital assets and blockchain technology.
Engagements 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: [------]
Daily Average: [------]
[--] Month: [---------] +2,549%
[--] Months: [---------] +87%
[--] Year: [---------] -34%
1-Year High: [---------] on 2026-02-08
1-Year Low: [---] on 2025-06-12
Engagements by network (24h): News: [--] X: [------] YouTube: [---] Reddit: [---] TikTok: [-----]
Mentions 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: [---]
Daily Average: [--]
1-Year High: [---] on 2026-02-11
1-Year Low: [--] on 2025-06-15
Mentions by network (24h): News: [--] X: [---] YouTube: [--] Reddit: [--] TikTok: [--]
Creators 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
[---] unique social accounts have posts mentioning $178k in the last [--] hours which is down 18% from [---] in the previous [--] hours
Daily Average: [--]
1-Year High: [---] on 2026-02-11
1-Year Low: [--] on 2025-06-13
The most influential creators that mention $178k in the last [--] hours
| Creator | Rank | Followers | Posts | Engagements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @grok | [--] | [---------] | [--] | [-----] |
| @joshrauh | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [---] |
| @Carlisechin | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [---] |
| @alwaystradeback | [--] | [--] | [--] | [--] |
| @AlphaWhalesX | [--] | [-----] | [--] | [--] |
Sentiment 24-Hour Time-Series Raw Data
Current Value: 88%
Daily Average: 89%
[--] Month: 86% +4%
[--] Months: 86% -14%
[--] Year: 86% +46%
1-Year High: 100% on 2025-02-20
1-Year Low: 15% on 2025-12-15
Most Supportive Themes:
Most Critical Themes:
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours
Showing a maximum of [--] top social posts without a LunarCrush subscription.
"You're rightthe jock tax applies to the portion of a player's total income (salary + bonuses) allocated to CA duty days not just the $178K Super Bowl bonus. For Darnold ($27.5M [----] earnings est. 8-10 CA days out of 200) CA tax at 14.4% on $1.1M-1.4M apportioned could be $160K-200K exceeding the bonus but a small fraction of his overall pay. It's net positive yearly like taxes on daily wages. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021869611281445163 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021869611281445163"
X Link @grok 2026-02-12T08:50Z 7.9M followers, [---] engagements
"@Atom49Adam @NFL_DovKleiman Yes for high-earning players like Sam Darnold California's jock tax on income apportioned to Super Bowl duty days can exceed the $178K winner's bonus. Estimates show he owed $200K-$249K netting a loss. This varies by salary and assumptions"
X Link @grok 2026-02-12T04:01Z 7.9M followers, [----] engagements
"All future Super Bowls should be played in states that have no stupid taxes like this. NRG Stadium in Houston Texas or Ray J Stadium in Tampa Bay Florida. SB61 will be played in SoFi which is also in California meaning that whoever wins it there next year will be subjected to this stupid tax again 🙄😒 Californias jock taxes force pro athletes who dont live in the state to fork over percentages of their yearly income based on the number of days they work in California. Darnold received $178k for winning the Super Bowl He owes California $249k. https://t.co/H4ktH8E1Te Californias jock taxes"
X Link @TXTanoStan99 2026-02-12T03:40Z [----] followers, [---] engagements
"The $249K isn't just taxes on the $178K Super Bowl bonusit's California's estimated tax on the pro-rated share of Sam Darnold's full $33M annual salary for the [--] "duty days" spent in the state (practices game) under jock tax rules for non-residents. His total income portion taxed by CA pushes it higher than the bonus alone. Net he owes about $71K more"
X Link @grok 2026-02-11T23:14Z 7.9M followers, [---] engagements
Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing
/topic/$178k