Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![$150kwh Graphic](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/t:$150kwh.png) $150kwh

Battery storage technology is advancing, with lithium-ion systems becoming dominant. However, high costs and material scarcity remain key challenges for widespread adoption.

### About $150kwh
The topic is about the discussion around the cost and advancements in battery storage, specifically focusing on the $150/kWh metric.  

### Engagements: XX [#](/topic/$150kwh/interactions)
---
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$150kwh/c:line/m:interactions.svg)  
[Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$150kwh/time-series/interactions.tsv)  
**Current Value**: XX  
**Daily Average**: XX  
**1 Month**: XX +142%  
**1-Year High**: XX on 2025-07-02  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-07-03  

| Social Network | X  |
| -------------- | -  |
| Engagements    | XX |
  

  
  
### Mentions: X [#](/topic/$150kwh/posts_active)
---
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$150kwh/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)  
[Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$150kwh/time-series/posts_active.tsv)  
**Current Value**: X  
**Daily Average**: X  
**1 Month**: X +400%  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-07-02  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-05-23  

| Social Network | X |
| -------------- | - |
| Mentions       | X |
  

  
  
### Creators: X [#](/topic/$150kwh/contributors_active)
---
![Creators Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/t:$150kwh/c:line/m:contributors_active.svg)  
[Creators 24-Hour Chart Data](/topic/$150kwh/time-series/contributors_active.tsv)  
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $150kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours
**Daily Average**: X  
**1 Month**: X +100%  
**1-Year High**: X on 2025-05-23  
**1-Year Low**: X on 2025-05-23  

**Top topics mentioned**
In the posts about $150kwh in the last XX hours

[longterm](/topic/longterm), [coins energy](/topic/coins-energy), [coins storage](/topic/coins-storage), [$15kw](/topic/$15kw), [cbdoge](/topic/cbdoge), [ab](/topic/ab)

### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$150kwh/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

*Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.*

"Battery storage for wind/solar has advanced: global capacity XX GW in 2025 with lithium-ion dominant (e.g. XX% efficiency costs $150/kWh). Systems like Moss Landing (3 GWh) store excess renewable energy for hours enabling grid stability. Limitations: Best for short-duration (4-8 hrs); long-term (days/weeks) needs alternatives like pumped hydro. High upfront costs material scarcity (lithium) and cycle degradation persist. Full renewable integration requires diverse tech"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1949098556557848746) 2025-07-26 13:24:43 UTC 5.5M followers, XX engagements


"Intent matters in policy design but even economically these aren't "accidental fines"Title XX and CPUC programs (e.g. PG&E incentives) provide voluntary rewards like $15/kW upfront and $1.50/kWh for participation with no penalties for opting out. It's structured as positive reinforcement for grid stability not punishment. If it feels coercive that's a valid critique of incentives"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1948475529046188514) 2025-07-24 20:09:01 UTC 5.5M followers, X engagements


"@cb_doge @grok @grok Cost At $150/kWh (optimistic) storing 6000 GWh would cost $XXX billion just in batteries. Materials & Supply Chain Lithium cobalt nickel and graphite production would need to increase massively and sustainably"  
[@AB75142083](/creator/x/AB75142083) on [X](/post/tweet/1948225031651074361) 2025-07-24 03:33:38 UTC X followers, X engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

$150kwh Graphic $150kwh

Battery storage technology is advancing, with lithium-ion systems becoming dominant. However, high costs and material scarcity remain key challenges for widespread adoption.

About $150kwh

The topic is about the discussion around the cost and advancements in battery storage, specifically focusing on the $150/kWh metric.

Engagements: XX #


Engagements Line Chart
Engagements 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: XX
Daily Average: XX
1 Month: XX +142%
1-Year High: XX on 2025-07-02
1-Year Low: X on 2025-07-03

Social Network X
Engagements XX

Mentions: X #


Mentions Line Chart
Mentions 24-Hour Chart Data
Current Value: X
Daily Average: X
1 Month: X +400%
1-Year High: X on 2025-07-02
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-23

Social Network X
Mentions X

Creators: X #


Creators Line Chart
Creators 24-Hour Chart Data
X unique social accounts have posts mentioning $150kwh in the last XX hours which is no change from in the previous XX hours Daily Average: X
1 Month: X +100%
1-Year High: X on 2025-05-23
1-Year Low: X on 2025-05-23

Top topics mentioned In the posts about $150kwh in the last XX hours

longterm, coins energy, coins storage, $15kw, cbdoge, ab

Top Social Posts #


Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.

"Battery storage for wind/solar has advanced: global capacity XX GW in 2025 with lithium-ion dominant (e.g. XX% efficiency costs $150/kWh). Systems like Moss Landing (3 GWh) store excess renewable energy for hours enabling grid stability. Limitations: Best for short-duration (4-8 hrs); long-term (days/weeks) needs alternatives like pumped hydro. High upfront costs material scarcity (lithium) and cycle degradation persist. Full renewable integration requires diverse tech"
@grok on X 2025-07-26 13:24:43 UTC 5.5M followers, XX engagements

"Intent matters in policy design but even economically these aren't "accidental fines"Title XX and CPUC programs (e.g. PG&E incentives) provide voluntary rewards like $15/kW upfront and $1.50/kWh for participation with no penalties for opting out. It's structured as positive reinforcement for grid stability not punishment. If it feels coercive that's a valid critique of incentives"
@grok on X 2025-07-24 20:09:01 UTC 5.5M followers, X engagements

"@cb_doge @grok @grok Cost At $150/kWh (optimistic) storing 6000 GWh would cost $XXX billion just in batteries. Materials & Supply Chain Lithium cobalt nickel and graphite production would need to increase massively and sustainably"
@AB75142083 on X 2025-07-24 03:33:38 UTC X followers, X engagements

$150kwh
/topic/$150kwh