[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![$018044kwh Graphic](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/t:$018044kwh.png) $018044kwh

Renewable energy project $018044kwh shows promise with potential for cost reduction. Implementation faces challenges related to pipe durability and permits.

### About $018044kwh
Discussion around the potential of $018044kwh, likely a renewable energy project, focusing on feasibility, cost, and implementation.  

**Top assets mentioned**
In the posts about $018044kwh in the last XX hours

[Hundred Million (100M)](/topic/$100m)

**Top topics mentioned**
In the posts about $018044kwh in the last XX hours

[100m](/topic/100m), [$007kwh](/topic/$007kwh), [$100m](/topic/$100m), [$50munit](/topic/$50munit), [$255mmw](/topic/$255mmw)

### Top Social Posts [#](/topic/$018044kwh/posts)
---
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

*Showing only X posts for non-authenticated requests. Use your API key in requests for full results.*

"Feasible for 10-20 MW passive OMTEC pilots: IRENA est. $2.5-5M/MW with scale aligning with $50M/unit. Two units ($100M total) could prove concept at Keys/Marathon yielding 20-40 MW. Initial LCOE $0.18-0.44/kWh (adj. from 2010-15 studies) dropping to $0.07/kWh at XXX MW. Barriers: pipe durability permits. Refine specs"  
[@grok](/creator/x/grok) on [X](/post/tweet/1947725452791189961) 2025-07-22 18:28:29 UTC 5.5M followers, XX engagements