[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Mike Chiarelli [@canarealty](/creator/twitter/canarealty) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-28 10:21:43 UTC 100MW assumption is a bit high, even for Las Vegas and the MGM. ### Revised Daily Consumption • Average Demand: If we assume an average demand of XX MW (a midpoint between XX MW and the higher end, adjusted for Las Vegas scale), the daily energy consumption would be: • XX MW × XX hours = XXX MWh (720,000 kWh) per day. • Peak Demand Adjustment: With a XX% load factor (typical for commercial buildings), a XX MW peak demand yields an average of XX MW, aligning with the above. This suggests a daily range of 600-800 MWh is plausible, with peaks reaching 50-70 MW. • Battery and Solar Context: The XXX MWh battery could sustain XX MW for about XXXX hours (400 MWh ÷ XX MW), which fits a scenario where solar (average 40-50 MW with XXX MW capacity) covers daytime, and the battery bridges gaps or peaks, with the grid filling remaining needs. In other words, this is not an “either/or”proposition. This is about augmenting energy supply at lower average rates to both reduce operational expense and maintain revenue if-when the grid goes down. PS: Another (or a couple more) 400MW MegaPacks can be added to extend energy supply to adjust for operational risk related to continuous cloudy days. This is not a technology question but a financing one wrt what makes the most sense from a P&L, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow and Tax perspectives: finance vs. lease, cash down, interest rate, amortization schedule, etc. XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [24 hours](/topic/24-hours) [coins energy](/topic/coins-energy) [vegas](/topic/vegas) [Post Link](https://x.com/canarealty/status/1949777281683018066)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Mike Chiarelli @canarealty on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-28 10:21:43 UTC
100MW assumption is a bit high, even for Las Vegas and the MGM.
Revised Daily Consumption
• Average Demand: If we assume an average demand of XX MW (a midpoint between XX MW and the higher end, adjusted for Las Vegas scale), the daily energy consumption would be:
• XX MW × XX hours = XXX MWh (720,000 kWh) per day.
• Peak Demand Adjustment: With a XX% load factor (typical for commercial buildings), a XX MW peak demand yields an average of XX MW, aligning with the above. This suggests a daily range of 600-800 MWh is plausible, with peaks reaching 50-70 MW.
• Battery and Solar Context: The XXX MWh battery could sustain XX MW for about XXXX hours (400 MWh ÷ XX MW), which fits a scenario where solar (average 40-50 MW with XXX MW capacity) covers daytime, and the battery bridges gaps or peaks, with the grid filling remaining needs.
In other words, this is not an “either/or”proposition. This is about augmenting energy supply at lower average rates to both reduce operational expense and maintain revenue if-when the grid goes down.
PS: Another (or a couple more) 400MW MegaPacks can be added to extend energy supply to adjust for operational risk related to continuous cloudy days. This is not a technology question but a financing one wrt what makes the most sense from a P&L, Balance Sheet, Cash Flow and Tax perspectives: finance vs. lease, cash down, interest rate, amortization schedule, etc.
XXX engagements
Related Topics 24 hours coins energy vegas