[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  PepperMintyDog [@SuperMintyDog](/creator/twitter/SuperMintyDog) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-26 21:55:05 UTC No I'm taking the evidence and then applying that to a necessary cause to explain the evidence. You're looking for impossible hypotheticals in universe to explain the universe and brushing away paradoxes and irrational logical dead ends. If your explanation is that the universe was just a small eternal thing that blew up within a point in time in infinite time which also existed infinitely into the bounds of a space that ends nowhere and it has no cause and has all the power, intelligent design and rational nature of God, youre selling me something fundamentally vapid. Its an attempt to get rid of God and replace it with an irrational god that makes no sense, because you're not beholden to the one you don't want, which is the only one that is sufficient to explain the evidence. We do know the universe is not eternal, time is not eternal, if you're now trying to argue otherwise to grasp onto some desperate explanation, you're at odds with the scientific study of the universe and you're violating how time works, mathematics work and the laws of thermodynamics. You see, you hear what I'm saying, but then you just pretend you didn't. I've explained to you infinite regression of time, you just pretend that was never added to the dialogue, I've explained to you the issue with the expansion of the universe and finite matter and energy expenditure, we just pretend that was never said. Inventing this idea of a singularity doesn't change anything it just replaces the birth of the universe with a tiny universe in compression that exists infinitely in time, which is absurd on every possible level and does nothing to explain any of what you need to explain. X engagements  **Related Topics** [eternal](/topic/eternal) [Post Link](https://x.com/SuperMintyDog/status/1949226996216615380)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
PepperMintyDog @SuperMintyDog on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-26 21:55:05 UTC
No I'm taking the evidence and then applying that to a necessary cause to explain the evidence. You're looking for impossible hypotheticals in universe to explain the universe and brushing away paradoxes and irrational logical dead ends.
If your explanation is that the universe was just a small eternal thing that blew up within a point in time in infinite time which also existed infinitely into the bounds of a space that ends nowhere and it has no cause and has all the power, intelligent design and rational nature of God, youre selling me something fundamentally vapid. Its an attempt to get rid of God and replace it with an irrational god that makes no sense, because you're not beholden to the one you don't want, which is the only one that is sufficient to explain the evidence.
We do know the universe is not eternal, time is not eternal, if you're now trying to argue otherwise to grasp onto some desperate explanation, you're at odds with the scientific study of the universe and you're violating how time works, mathematics work and the laws of thermodynamics. You see, you hear what I'm saying, but then you just pretend you didn't. I've explained to you infinite regression of time, you just pretend that was never added to the dialogue, I've explained to you the issue with the expansion of the universe and finite matter and energy expenditure, we just pretend that was never said.
Inventing this idea of a singularity doesn't change anything it just replaces the birth of the universe with a tiny universe in compression that exists infinitely in time, which is absurd on every possible level and does nothing to explain any of what you need to explain.
X engagements
Related Topics eternal