[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
 Kaspa King [@KaspaKing1](/creator/twitter/KaspaKing1) on x 2832 followers
Created: 2025-07-26 19:36:42 UTC
Let’s let the AI weigh in on Kaspa and Bitcoin as peer-to-peer money.
To compare Kaspa and Bitcoin as peer-to-peer (P2P) money, we need to evaluate their effectiveness in fulfilling the original vision of P2P electronic cash as outlined in Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin whitepaper: a decentralized, trustless system for fast, low-cost, and secure transactions. Below is a detailed comparison based on key attributes relevant to P2P money, such as transaction speed, scalability, decentralization, security, fees, and adoption.
X. Transaction Speed and Scalability
* Bitcoin:
* Bitcoin processes approximately X transactions per second (TPS) due to its linear blockchain structure, with a block time of XX minutes. This leads to slow confirmation times (often 10–60 minutes for full confirmation) and network congestion during high demand, making it less practical for everyday P2P transactions like buying coffee or tipping.
* The Lightning Network, a Layer-2 solution, was developed to improve Bitcoin’s scalability by enabling faster, off-chain transactions. However, running a Lightning node requires technical expertise, and the network relies on centralized hubs for liquidity, which some argue undermines Bitcoin’s P2P ethos.
* Bitcoin’s slow block rate and limited throughput make it less suitable for high-frequency, low-value P2P transactions.
* Kaspa:
* Kaspa uses a BlockDAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) structure with the GHOSTDAG/DAGKnightprotocol, allowing multiple blocks to be processed in parallel. This enables XX blocks per second (BPS) currently, with transaction visibility in X second and full confirmation in about XX seconds. Kaspa aims to scale to 32–100 BPS in the future, potentially supporting thousands of TPS.
* Kaspa’s design solves the blockchain trilemma (balancing speed, security, and decentralization) better than Bitcoin, making it highly suitable for fast, low-cost P2P transactions like micro-payments or everyday purchases.
* Unlike Bitcoin, Kaspa achieves high throughput on its Layer-1, eliminating the need for centralized Layer-2 solutions like Lightning.
Verdict: Kaspa significantly outperforms Bitcoin in transaction speed and scalability, making it more practical for P2P electronic cash use cases.
XXX engagements
**Related Topics**
[decentralized](/topic/decentralized)
[satoshi](/topic/satoshi)
[money](/topic/money)
[coins ai](/topic/coins-ai)
[kaspa](/topic/kaspa)
[coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1)
[coins pow](/topic/coins-pow)
[coins made in usa](/topic/coins-made-in-usa)
[Post Link](https://x.com/KaspaKing1/status/1949192172466770385)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Kaspa King @KaspaKing1 on x 2832 followers
Created: 2025-07-26 19:36:42 UTC
Let’s let the AI weigh in on Kaspa and Bitcoin as peer-to-peer money.
To compare Kaspa and Bitcoin as peer-to-peer (P2P) money, we need to evaluate their effectiveness in fulfilling the original vision of P2P electronic cash as outlined in Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin whitepaper: a decentralized, trustless system for fast, low-cost, and secure transactions. Below is a detailed comparison based on key attributes relevant to P2P money, such as transaction speed, scalability, decentralization, security, fees, and adoption.
X. Transaction Speed and Scalability
- Bitcoin:
- Bitcoin processes approximately X transactions per second (TPS) due to its linear blockchain structure, with a block time of XX minutes. This leads to slow confirmation times (often 10–60 minutes for full confirmation) and network congestion during high demand, making it less practical for everyday P2P transactions like buying coffee or tipping.
- The Lightning Network, a Layer-2 solution, was developed to improve Bitcoin’s scalability by enabling faster, off-chain transactions. However, running a Lightning node requires technical expertise, and the network relies on centralized hubs for liquidity, which some argue undermines Bitcoin’s P2P ethos.
- Bitcoin’s slow block rate and limited throughput make it less suitable for high-frequency, low-value P2P transactions.
- Kaspa:
- Kaspa uses a BlockDAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) structure with the GHOSTDAG/DAGKnightprotocol, allowing multiple blocks to be processed in parallel. This enables XX blocks per second (BPS) currently, with transaction visibility in X second and full confirmation in about XX seconds. Kaspa aims to scale to 32–100 BPS in the future, potentially supporting thousands of TPS.
- Kaspa’s design solves the blockchain trilemma (balancing speed, security, and decentralization) better than Bitcoin, making it highly suitable for fast, low-cost P2P transactions like micro-payments or everyday purchases.
- Unlike Bitcoin, Kaspa achieves high throughput on its Layer-1, eliminating the need for centralized Layer-2 solutions like Lightning. Verdict: Kaspa significantly outperforms Bitcoin in transaction speed and scalability, making it more practical for P2P electronic cash use cases.
XXX engagements
Related Topics decentralized satoshi money coins ai kaspa coins layer 1 coins pow coins made in usa