[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![sergey_tutoov Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1364028037273165825.png) 💎 WEB3MAN.exe [@sergey_tutoov](/creator/twitter/sergey_tutoov) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-26 09:33:00 UTC

DOT inflation at XXXX% signals a pivot point for shared-security economics on Polkadot

A XXXX B cap proposal in OpenGov would:
✧ Stabilize supply dynamics - fewer DOT minted per block means stronger diamond-hand vibes and more predictable staking yield
✧ Align incentives - validators and collators stay incentivized via transaction fees and coretime rentals, not just inflation
✧ Boost on-chain governance - capping supply sharpens tokenholder focus on referendum outcomes, from async backing upgrades to XCM fee adjustments

With capped supply, $DOT becomes scarcer than grandpa’s flip phone in a 5G world - price discovery moves north

LFG to $XXX 💎

Which OpenGov referendum would you prioritize post-cap: elastic scaling parameters or next-gen slot auction tweaks?


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1949040244801651032/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[onchain](/topic/onchain)
[staking](/topic/staking)
[signals](/topic/signals)
[inflation](/topic/inflation)
[dot](/topic/dot)

[Post Link](https://x.com/sergey_tutoov/status/1949040244801651032)