[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Niels Groeneveld [@nigroeneveld](/creator/twitter/nigroeneveld) on x 12.8K followers Created: 2025-07-26 09:16:03 UTC The Media Knew. You Knew. So Why Are They Lying About Epstein and Trump? In the latest display of manufactured ignorance, many major U.S. media outlets have claimed that Donald Trump was “informed” just two months ago that he appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s files. The implication is that this is new, shocking, and previously undisclosed information. It is not. It has been public knowledge for years. And the suggestion otherwise is not just inaccurate—it’s insulting to anyone who’s been paying attention. Trump’s presence in Epstein-related material has been a matter of public record for well over a decade. His name appears repeatedly in unsealed court documents, flight logs, depositions, and testimonies. Journalists, legal researchers, and watchdog organizations have reported extensively on these documents. Tens of thousands of articles, blog posts, and legal summaries have examined Trump’s ties—direct or tangential—to Epstein’s world. This is not obscure, hidden knowledge. This is documented, indexed, archived, and freely accessible to anyone with internet access and a basic grasp of how to search court records. So when media outlets now act as though this is a revelatory moment, it’s not merely sloppy. It’s deceptive. Either these newsrooms have suddenly lost all institutional memory, or they’re deliberately reshaping the timeline for reasons that have nothing to do with journalistic truth-telling. And that’s what makes this so dangerous. This is not a case of late reporting—it is a case of willful narrative laundering. The American press often touts its role as a pillar of democracy, a watchdog for the people. But when it bends reality in service of a simplified, easily digestible storyline, it ceases to inform and begins to manipulate. Pretending that Trump’s connection to Epstein has only just emerged is not a public service; it’s a public disservice, meant to create sensation where there should be sober, long-term accountability. It’s not the public that’s uninformed. It’s the media that’s pretending to forget.  XX engagements  **Related Topics** [files](/topic/files) [jeffrey epsteins](/topic/jeffrey-epsteins) [donald trump](/topic/donald-trump) [jeffrey epstein](/topic/jeffrey-epstein) [Post Link](https://x.com/nigroeneveld/status/1949035981534822809)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Niels Groeneveld @nigroeneveld on x 12.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-26 09:16:03 UTC
The Media Knew. You Knew. So Why Are They Lying About Epstein and Trump?
In the latest display of manufactured ignorance, many major U.S. media outlets have claimed that Donald Trump was “informed” just two months ago that he appears in Jeffrey Epstein’s files. The implication is that this is new, shocking, and previously undisclosed information. It is not. It has been public knowledge for years. And the suggestion otherwise is not just inaccurate—it’s insulting to anyone who’s been paying attention.
Trump’s presence in Epstein-related material has been a matter of public record for well over a decade. His name appears repeatedly in unsealed court documents, flight logs, depositions, and testimonies. Journalists, legal researchers, and watchdog organizations have reported extensively on these documents. Tens of thousands of articles, blog posts, and legal summaries have examined Trump’s ties—direct or tangential—to Epstein’s world. This is not obscure, hidden knowledge. This is documented, indexed, archived, and freely accessible to anyone with internet access and a basic grasp of how to search court records.
So when media outlets now act as though this is a revelatory moment, it’s not merely sloppy. It’s deceptive. Either these newsrooms have suddenly lost all institutional memory, or they’re deliberately reshaping the timeline for reasons that have nothing to do with journalistic truth-telling. And that’s what makes this so dangerous. This is not a case of late reporting—it is a case of willful narrative laundering.
The American press often touts its role as a pillar of democracy, a watchdog for the people. But when it bends reality in service of a simplified, easily digestible storyline, it ceases to inform and begins to manipulate. Pretending that Trump’s connection to Epstein has only just emerged is not a public service; it’s a public disservice, meant to create sensation where there should be sober, long-term accountability.
It’s not the public that’s uninformed. It’s the media that’s pretending to forget.
XX engagements
Related Topics files jeffrey epsteins donald trump jeffrey epstein