[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Milad 🐜 [@0xMiladx0](/creator/twitter/0xMiladx0) on x 4511 followers Created: 2025-07-26 00:57:30 UTC 1/ Let’s talk infrastructure. Both @iotex_io and @peaq are active in the Machine Economy and DePIN space. But when you look under the hood, a clear architectural and strategic divergence appears 2/ Focus IoTeX approaches DePIN from its IoT origins integrating devices, data feeds, and smart contracts. peaq was purpose-built for the Machine Economy from day one targeting physical infrastructure, autonomous agents, and robotic networks. 3/ Throughput & Execution IoTeX processes ~5K TPS sufficient for many IoT applications. #peaq by contrast, pushes 100K+ TPS with low latency essential for high-frequency, real-time machine interactions and scalable deployments. 4/ Transaction Costs peaq’s average transaction cost: ~$0.00025. That’s economically viable for microtransactions at machine scale. IoTeX fees are higher and less predictable under network load a friction point for automation at scale. 5/ Architecture peaq runs on a modular Layer-1 with Elastic Scaling and Agile Core Time enabling dynamic load management and high performance. IoTeX has its own innovations, but it hasn’t yet achieved the same adaptive scaling footprint. 6/ Smart Contract Flexibility peaq supports both EVM and Rust smart contracts offering security, performance, and developer versatility. IoTeX is EVM-only, limiting optimization and language diversity. 7/ Ecosystem Scale peaq is powering 850K+ devices across smart agri tech, robotics, environmental DePINs, and more. IoTeX has strong IoT use cases but the breadth and scale of machine-based integrations on peaq are materially wider. 8/ Token Model PEAQ’s disinflationary design introduces long-term monetary predictability critical for ecosystem-level planning. IoTeX’s model lacks the same stability mechanisms. 9/ Partnerships peaq collaborates with Bosch, and others and backs its ecosystem with accelerators and grant programs. IoTeX is active too, but peaq’s vertical alignment and partner stack show more strategic cohesion. 10/ If you're building or investing in DePIN at infrastructure scale where machines, agents, and devices interact continuously $Peaq is clearly positioning itself as the Layer-1 fabric for the physical internet. The Machine Economy needs more than throughput it needs architectural intent. And that’s what #peaq delivers.  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [hood](/topic/hood) [iotexio](/topic/iotexio) [Post Link](https://x.com/0xMiladx0/status/1948910513523392805)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Milad 🐜 @0xMiladx0 on x 4511 followers
Created: 2025-07-26 00:57:30 UTC
1/ Let’s talk infrastructure. Both @iotex_io and @peaq are active in the Machine Economy and DePIN space. But when you look under the hood, a clear architectural and strategic divergence appears
2/ Focus IoTeX approaches DePIN from its IoT origins integrating devices, data feeds, and smart contracts. peaq was purpose-built for the Machine Economy from day one targeting physical infrastructure, autonomous agents, and robotic networks.
3/ Throughput & Execution IoTeX processes ~5K TPS sufficient for many IoT applications. #peaq by contrast, pushes 100K+ TPS with low latency essential for high-frequency, real-time machine interactions and scalable deployments.
4/ Transaction Costs peaq’s average transaction cost: ~$0.00025. That’s economically viable for microtransactions at machine scale.
IoTeX fees are higher and less predictable under network load a friction point for automation at scale.
5/ Architecture peaq runs on a modular Layer-1 with Elastic Scaling and Agile Core Time enabling dynamic load management and high performance. IoTeX has its own innovations, but it hasn’t yet achieved the same adaptive scaling footprint.
6/ Smart Contract Flexibility peaq supports both EVM and Rust smart contracts offering security, performance, and developer versatility.
IoTeX is EVM-only, limiting optimization and language diversity.
7/ Ecosystem Scale peaq is powering 850K+ devices across smart agri tech, robotics, environmental DePINs, and more. IoTeX has strong IoT use cases but the breadth and scale of machine-based integrations on peaq are materially wider.
8/ Token Model PEAQ’s disinflationary design introduces long-term monetary predictability critical for ecosystem-level planning. IoTeX’s model lacks the same stability mechanisms.
9/ Partnerships peaq collaborates with Bosch, and others and backs its ecosystem with accelerators and grant programs.
IoTeX is active too, but peaq’s vertical alignment and partner stack show more strategic cohesion.
10/ If you're building or investing in DePIN at infrastructure scale where machines, agents, and devices interact continuously $Peaq is clearly positioning itself as the Layer-1 fabric for the physical internet.
The Machine Economy needs more than throughput it needs architectural intent. And that’s what #peaq delivers.
XXX engagements
