[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Cardano YOD₳ [@JaromirTesar](/creator/twitter/JaromirTesar) on x 12.8K followers Created: 2025-07-25 19:08:45 UTC DReps are responsible for the Treasury, but some are voting YES on every withdrawal. Why? Some argue that passing the Ekklesia filter should guarantee funding. Others claim it's a counterweight to inactive DReps. I disagree. Passing Ekklesia ≠ automatic funding. Off-chain voting is just filtering ideas — it’s not the same as on-chain Treasury decisions, where real funding is approved and responsibility matters. Hitting the withdrawal threshold (67%) is harder and more meaningful. DReps are apparently actively voting for good proposals. For example, Amaru got XXX DRep votes. 3.98B stake actively voted YES (~75%), only 1.16B stake did not vote. DReps should not be afraid to choose winners and losers. They are responsible for the Treasury and for Cardano. Voting YES on every proposal sets a dangerous precedent. ADA in the Treasury attracts plenty of proposals — some valuable, others bloated and costly. Greed can creep in, and not every project deserves funding. DReps are meant to support initiatives that truly move Cardano forward. Approving everything dilutes that purpose. I recommend that all DReps who vote YES for all withdrawals vote Abstain instead. Let’s safeguard the Treasury for projects that genuinely matter.  XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [approved](/topic/approved) [onchain](/topic/onchain) [cardano](/topic/cardano) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [coins made in usa](/topic/coins-made-in-usa) [coins cardano](/topic/coins-cardano) [coins pos](/topic/coins-pos) [Post Link](https://x.com/JaromirTesar/status/1948822751172841597)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Cardano YOD₳ @JaromirTesar on x 12.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-25 19:08:45 UTC
DReps are responsible for the Treasury, but some are voting YES on every withdrawal.
Why?
Some argue that passing the Ekklesia filter should guarantee funding. Others claim it's a counterweight to inactive DReps.
I disagree. Passing Ekklesia ≠ automatic funding.
Off-chain voting is just filtering ideas — it’s not the same as on-chain Treasury decisions, where real funding is approved and responsibility matters.
Hitting the withdrawal threshold (67%) is harder and more meaningful.
DReps are apparently actively voting for good proposals.
For example, Amaru got XXX DRep votes. 3.98B stake actively voted YES (~75%), only 1.16B stake did not vote.
DReps should not be afraid to choose winners and losers. They are responsible for the Treasury and for Cardano.
Voting YES on every proposal sets a dangerous precedent.
ADA in the Treasury attracts plenty of proposals — some valuable, others bloated and costly.
Greed can creep in, and not every project deserves funding.
DReps are meant to support initiatives that truly move Cardano forward. Approving everything dilutes that purpose.
I recommend that all DReps who vote YES for all withdrawals vote Abstain instead.
Let’s safeguard the Treasury for projects that genuinely matter.
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics approved onchain cardano coins layer 1 coins made in usa coins cardano coins pos