[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  CrediBULL Crypto [@CredibleCrypto](/creator/twitter/CredibleCrypto) on x 473.4K followers Created: 2025-07-25 17:53:49 UTC On the real though, from a TA perspective this would be the best case scenario: A leading diagonal has X subwaves but unlike a traditional impulse they DO overlap and the subwaves are X legged, corrective structures. This makes these moves tricky to trust because they look corrective by default. Invalidation for this "best case" would be the original which is basically at our lows and right above the inefficiency, so the bottom is either in and the next leg up has begun (albeit in a non-traditional way), OR we will invalidate this idea and finally get a test of the inefficiency below. Let's see what we get 🍿 $CRV  XXXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [ta](/topic/ta) [Post Link](https://x.com/CredibleCrypto/status/1948803892700909825)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
CrediBULL Crypto @CredibleCrypto on x 473.4K followers
Created: 2025-07-25 17:53:49 UTC
On the real though, from a TA perspective this would be the best case scenario:
A leading diagonal has X subwaves but unlike a traditional impulse they DO overlap and the subwaves are X legged, corrective structures. This makes these moves tricky to trust because they look corrective by default.
Invalidation for this "best case" would be the original which is basically at our lows and right above the inefficiency, so the bottom is either in and the next leg up has begun (albeit in a non-traditional way), OR we will invalidate this idea and finally get a test of the inefficiency below.
Let's see what we get 🍿
$CRV
XXXXXXX engagements
Related Topics ta