[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  JL | NoProtocol ⛓️💥 [@ntroJL](/creator/twitter/ntroJL) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-25 16:11:00 UTC I'm gonna go on a whole spiel here. One of the core reasons TC is failing (aside of the collapse) is due to too many chefs wanting to be in the kitchen with no cooking experience. The community can fight over L1 governance as it is their right to vote on L1 upgrades and such. In the same breath, there are some loud dumb mother fuckers you guys allow to guide factions like LunaClassicGPT who doesn't know shit ass while spewing "We want to be treated like a business" but have zero business plans. At this point in time, L2 should be your main priority to bring volume onto the chain. How do you do that? You provide incentives. You can't open up shop, invite builders over to a desert, give them no start up money and tax them all at once. It doesn't make logical sense. Therefore, I suggest creating a grant program (or entity) with non-biased members who can fulfill this role. All grant money should come from the CP into a multi-sig wallet prior where the community has zero say on who receives the grant. Why do I say that? Because that's too much overhead and micromanagement for a bunch of people who don't know business nor growth. Then you market the fuck out of the grant program. No, do not market the blockchain, it makes no sense to do that in your current state. It would do you more bad than good. Grants provide minimal risk with a potential huge upside assuming you all have your heads in order. How do you find potential projects? The grants program should pick and choose who they believe would fit best to locate potential projects that would be interested in building on the chain. The incentive would be stipends for these individuals. How much is at the grants program discretion. If anyone reading this has doubts on this path, then ask yourselves the question "what do we have going for us that would incentivize people to come to our chain?" Do not want to hear "WE HAVE BINANCE SUPPORT AND A PASSIONATE COMMUNITY" That shit is old news and it reflects on your token prices. Thank you for coming to my ted talk. XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [governance](/topic/governance) [gonna](/topic/gonna) [Post Link](https://x.com/ntroJL/status/1948778017439772786)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
JL | NoProtocol ⛓️💥 @ntroJL on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-25 16:11:00 UTC
I'm gonna go on a whole spiel here. One of the core reasons TC is failing (aside of the collapse) is due to too many chefs wanting to be in the kitchen with no cooking experience. The community can fight over L1 governance as it is their right to vote on L1 upgrades and such. In the same breath, there are some loud dumb mother fuckers you guys allow to guide factions like LunaClassicGPT who doesn't know shit ass while spewing "We want to be treated like a business" but have zero business plans.
At this point in time, L2 should be your main priority to bring volume onto the chain. How do you do that? You provide incentives. You can't open up shop, invite builders over to a desert, give them no start up money and tax them all at once. It doesn't make logical sense. Therefore, I suggest creating a grant program (or entity) with non-biased members who can fulfill this role. All grant money should come from the CP into a multi-sig wallet prior where the community has zero say on who receives the grant. Why do I say that? Because that's too much overhead and micromanagement for a bunch of people who don't know business nor growth.
Then you market the fuck out of the grant program. No, do not market the blockchain, it makes no sense to do that in your current state. It would do you more bad than good. Grants provide minimal risk with a potential huge upside assuming you all have your heads in order. How do you find potential projects? The grants program should pick and choose who they believe would fit best to locate potential projects that would be interested in building on the chain. The incentive would be stipends for these individuals. How much is at the grants program discretion.
If anyone reading this has doubts on this path, then ask yourselves the question "what do we have going for us that would incentivize people to come to our chain?" Do not want to hear "WE HAVE BINANCE SUPPORT AND A PASSIONATE COMMUNITY" That shit is old news and it reflects on your token prices.
Thank you for coming to my ted talk.
XXX engagements
Related Topics governance gonna