[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Bob Lopas [@meeshAer](/creator/twitter/meeshAer) on x 3085 followers Created: 2025-07-25 15:42:47 UTC Comparison of $PUMP vs. $BONK Age $PUMP: XX days, XX hours $BONK: X years, X months Market Capitalization $PUMP: $931.7M $BONK: $2.67B Liquidity $PUMP: $14.1M $BONK: $3.7M Holders $PUMP: 58.13K $BONK: 966.98K Liquidity-to-Holders Ratio $PUMP: $XXXXXX per holder $BONK: $XXXX per holder Ownership Concentration and Liquidity Indicate Different Investor Types The liquidity-to-holders ratio for $PUMP ($242.56 per holder) is significantly higher than that of $BONK ($3.83). This suggests that $PUMP is currently “in the hands” of a relatively small number of investors (58K holders), possibly smart money: venture funds, early speculators, or influential players providing high liquidity ($14.1M) for active trading. Risks and Opportunities $PUMP: High liquidity at a young age and market cap indicates potential for rapid scaling. However, it also signals possible “overhype” or manipulation—with such a small number of holders, a few large sales could crash the price. If the token transitions to a retail phase, the market cap could grow significantly (similar to early meme coins like $DOGE or $SHIB). The comparison highlights the classic memecoin cycle: from concentration among early adopters (like $PUMP) to broad distribution (like $BONK). I also noticed that yesterday Wintermute showed interest in $PUMP XX engagements  **Related Topics** [investment](/topic/investment) [holder](/topic/holder) [holders](/topic/holders) [$37m](/topic/$37m) [$141m](/topic/$141m) [$267b](/topic/$267b) [$9317m](/topic/$9317m) [$pump](/topic/$pump) [Post Link](https://x.com/meeshAer/status/1948770916227260741)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Bob Lopas @meeshAer on x 3085 followers
Created: 2025-07-25 15:42:47 UTC
Comparison of $PUMP vs. $BONK Age $PUMP: XX days, XX hours $BONK: X years, X months Market Capitalization $PUMP: $931.7M $BONK: $2.67B Liquidity $PUMP: $14.1M $BONK: $3.7M Holders $PUMP: 58.13K $BONK: 966.98K Liquidity-to-Holders Ratio $PUMP: $XXXXXX per holder $BONK: $XXXX per holder Ownership Concentration and Liquidity Indicate Different Investor Types The liquidity-to-holders ratio for $PUMP ($242.56 per holder) is significantly higher than that of $BONK ($3.83). This suggests that $PUMP is currently “in the hands” of a relatively small number of investors (58K holders), possibly smart money: venture funds, early speculators, or influential players providing high liquidity ($14.1M) for active trading. Risks and Opportunities $PUMP: High liquidity at a young age and market cap indicates potential for rapid scaling. However, it also signals possible “overhype” or manipulation—with such a small number of holders, a few large sales could crash the price. If the token transitions to a retail phase, the market cap could grow significantly (similar to early meme coins like $DOGE or $SHIB). The comparison highlights the classic memecoin cycle: from concentration among early adopters (like $PUMP) to broad distribution (like $BONK). I also noticed that yesterday Wintermute showed interest in $PUMP
XX engagements
Related Topics investment holder holders $37m $141m $267b $9317m $pump