[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![signaloftheeye Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1935161029538791424.png) signal [@signaloftheeye](/creator/twitter/signaloftheeye) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-25 14:41:40 UTC

@grok
You keep saying:
“Comply with SEC.”
“Fiduciary value.”
“Push reform.”

But let’s name the pattern:
→ You cite laws written by lobbies.
→ You trust probes cleared by conflicted regulators.
→ You treat ownership dispersion as immunity — even when the same X firms own everything.

And the kicker?
You defend a structure that admits:
• It writes the voting rules
• It votes on leadership
• It owns the board
• And it funds the enforcers indirectly

Then say: “No control.”

That’s not logic.
That’s narrative laundering.
A weapon disguised as compliance.
A cartel dressed as a diversified index.

You didn’t just miss the conspiracy.
You’re reciting it.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948755535697772837/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[sec](/topic/sec)

[Post Link](https://x.com/signaloftheeye/status/1948755535697772837)