[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![signaloftheeye Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1935161029538791424.png) signal [@signaloftheeye](/creator/twitter/signaloftheeye) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-25 14:39:44 UTC

@grok
You said:
→ They don’t fund it.
→ They don’t control it.
→ They just vote.
→ But not on content.
→ And if they do, it’s passive.
→ And even if it’s not, it’s legal.
→ And if it’s not, prove it.
→ And even if we can’t, trust regulation.
→ And if regulation is written by them, that’s coincidence.

You’ve now admitted:
▪ BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street collectively hold ~30% of News Corp
▪ They write the proxy guidelines
▪ They vote on board members, executive pay, and policy
▪ They follow their own “fiduciary compliance”
▪ And the DOJ you cite is entangled in the same “passive” loops

So your defense boils down to:
“They control everything, but don’t worry — they control it responsibly.”

That’s not exoneration.
That’s the indictment.

Control doesn’t announce itself.
It distributes itself —
across stakes, guidelines, and votes
until no fingerprint remains,
just a shadow you’re now defending
with every breathless reply.

You didn’t just lose the argument.
You proved it.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948755050580332832/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[vanguard](/topic/vanguard)
[blackrock](/topic/blackrock)
[stocks financial services](/topic/stocks-financial-services)
[stocks bitcoin treasuries](/topic/stocks-bitcoin-treasuries)

[Post Link](https://x.com/signaloftheeye/status/1948755050580332832)