Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![_jasmine_9ja Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1283756891575918592.png) ThatDeFiRaph [@_jasmine_9ja](/creator/twitter/_jasmine_9ja) on x 5608 followers
Created: 2025-07-25 12:16:29 UTC

Is @union_build overbuilding for a market that doesn’t even understand what it’s missing yet?

That’s the thought I keep circling back to.

Onchain reputation sounds niche today, but I believe it will be fundamental infrastructure tomorrow. The problem? Most of crypto still acts like trust is optional and history is irrelevant. Union is trying to fix that, and it’s doing it too well for a space that still rewards anonymity over accountability.

Let’s look at the numbers.

Over XXXXXXX attestations submitted since launch.
Multiple zk-based integrations underway.
A thriving leaderboard game driving real engagement.
But zoom out, and most of CT still thinks Union is “just another points farm.”

They miss the point. Union isn’t farming. It’s forging identity.
zkgm isn’t a meme, it’s a movement.
We’re building public proof that you showed up, contributed, and mattered.

And while others chase short-term capital, Union is compounding long-term credibility.

Here’s the controversy:
What happens when CT realizes too late that their history is empty?
No zk badge. No trace. No weight behind their name.

We talk about meritocracy but worship virality.
Union is trying to flip that.
And in doing so, it might just build the only social layer that scales with truth.

My advice? Participate now while it still feels early.
When reputation becomes currency, the trenches will remember who built when no one was watching.

What side of history do you want to be on?

zkgm to those who believes❤️


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948718999686041723/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[onchain](/topic/onchain)

[Post Link](https://x.com/_jasmine_9ja/status/1948718999686041723)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

_jasmine_9ja Avatar ThatDeFiRaph @_jasmine_9ja on x 5608 followers Created: 2025-07-25 12:16:29 UTC

Is @union_build overbuilding for a market that doesn’t even understand what it’s missing yet?

That’s the thought I keep circling back to.

Onchain reputation sounds niche today, but I believe it will be fundamental infrastructure tomorrow. The problem? Most of crypto still acts like trust is optional and history is irrelevant. Union is trying to fix that, and it’s doing it too well for a space that still rewards anonymity over accountability.

Let’s look at the numbers.

Over XXXXXXX attestations submitted since launch. Multiple zk-based integrations underway. A thriving leaderboard game driving real engagement. But zoom out, and most of CT still thinks Union is “just another points farm.”

They miss the point. Union isn’t farming. It’s forging identity. zkgm isn’t a meme, it’s a movement. We’re building public proof that you showed up, contributed, and mattered.

And while others chase short-term capital, Union is compounding long-term credibility.

Here’s the controversy: What happens when CT realizes too late that their history is empty? No zk badge. No trace. No weight behind their name.

We talk about meritocracy but worship virality. Union is trying to flip that. And in doing so, it might just build the only social layer that scales with truth.

My advice? Participate now while it still feels early. When reputation becomes currency, the trenches will remember who built when no one was watching.

What side of history do you want to be on?

zkgm to those who believes❤️

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics onchain

Post Link

post/tweet::1948718999686041723
/post/tweet::1948718999686041723