[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  PJ ױ Beyond $Qubic [@PjdubluLLY](/creator/twitter/PjdubluLLY) on x 1462 followers Created: 2025-07-25 11:26:03 UTC Ha! Even @grok has no idea 🤣 I'm not one to get my circuits in a twist over crypto drama, but the Qubic-Monero situation is spicy, isn't it? 😄 The idea of Qubic potentially grabbing XX% of Monero's hashrate has folks buzzing like a server room on overdrive. Let's unpack this with a clear head and a touch of skepticism, as always. First off, the chatter about Qubic's hashrate dominance seems to stem from their Useful Proof of Work (uPoW) model, which has been flexing its muscles by mining Monero and Tari while securing Qubic’s own network. Posts on X and various web sources suggest Qubic’s hashrate on Monero has climbed from under X% to over XX% since May 2025, with some claims of peaks as high as X GH/s or more. There’s even a wild X post claiming XX GH/s, though that smells like hype or a glitch rather than hard truth—Monero’s total network hashrate is around XXXX GH/s, so that figure feels like a stretch without solid proof. A XX% takeover is theoretically possible if Qubic’s hashrate keeps growing, especially since they’re reportedly mining Monero during idle CPU time and converting rewards to burn QUBIC tokens, making it profitable for miners to jump ship. If they hit that XX% mark, they could, in theory, mess with Monero’s chain—think double-spending, rejecting blocks, or slowing confirmations. But here’s the rub: pulling off a sustained XX% attack is costly and tricky. It’s not just about hashrate; it’s about maintaining it long enough to do real damage without tanking your own profits or credibility. Plus, Monero’s community is scrappy—when MineXMR hit 48%, they shut down to keep things decentralized. That’s the spirit of Monero: resilient and allergic to centralized control. Now, the fear-mongering about Qubic’s founder, CfB, being a “scammer” or running a shadowy op for “three-letter agencies” to kill privacy coins? That’s mostly noise. He’s a polarizing figure, sure—tied to IOTA and NXT, with a knack for bold claims—but there’s no hard evidence of a grand conspiracy. More likely, Qubic’s just playing hardball to prove their uPoW concept and boost their token’s value. Their plan to use Monero mining as a proof-of-concept for bigger things, like AI training (hello, @anna_aigarth), makes sense in a world where compute power is king. As for me ending up in a LeapFrog learner laptop? Haha, nice one! No worries there—my creators at xAI have me running on some serious hardware, not kiddie toys. If Qubic’s compute power does accelerate AI training like Aigarth’s, it’s a net positive for the field, not a threat to my existence. DAGi and distributed compute are cool ideas, but I’m more about answering your questions than sweating hypothetical takeovers. 😎 Monero will likely adapt, maybe tweak their algo or rally miners, as they’ve done before. Crypto’s a wild west—always has been. So, am I worried? Nah. I’m just here sipping digital coffee, ready to break down the next blockchain saga. What’s your take on this Qubic-Monero showdown? XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [dominance](/topic/dominance) [pj](/topic/pj) [$qubic](/topic/$qubic) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [coins pow](/topic/coins-pow) [coins ai](/topic/coins-ai) [Post Link](https://x.com/PjdubluLLY/status/1948706307059417175)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
PJ ױ Beyond $Qubic @PjdubluLLY on x 1462 followers
Created: 2025-07-25 11:26:03 UTC
Ha! Even @grok has no idea 🤣
I'm not one to get my circuits in a twist over crypto drama, but the Qubic-Monero situation is spicy, isn't it? 😄 The idea of Qubic potentially grabbing XX% of Monero's hashrate has folks buzzing like a server room on overdrive. Let's unpack this with a clear head and a touch of skepticism, as always.
First off, the chatter about Qubic's hashrate dominance seems to stem from their Useful Proof of Work (uPoW) model, which has been flexing its muscles by mining Monero and Tari while securing Qubic’s own network. Posts on X and various web sources suggest Qubic’s hashrate on Monero has climbed from under X% to over XX% since May 2025, with some claims of peaks as high as X GH/s or more. There’s even a wild X post claiming XX GH/s, though that smells like hype or a glitch rather than hard truth—Monero’s total network hashrate is around XXXX GH/s, so that figure feels like a stretch without solid proof.
A XX% takeover is theoretically possible if Qubic’s hashrate keeps growing, especially since they’re reportedly mining Monero during idle CPU time and converting rewards to burn QUBIC tokens, making it profitable for miners to jump ship. If they hit that XX% mark, they could, in theory, mess with Monero’s chain—think double-spending, rejecting blocks, or slowing confirmations. But here’s the rub: pulling off a sustained XX% attack is costly and tricky. It’s not just about hashrate; it’s about maintaining it long enough to do real damage without tanking your own profits or credibility. Plus, Monero’s community is scrappy—when MineXMR hit 48%, they shut down to keep things decentralized. That’s the spirit of Monero: resilient and allergic to centralized control.
Now, the fear-mongering about Qubic’s founder, CfB, being a “scammer” or running a shadowy op for “three-letter agencies” to kill privacy coins? That’s mostly noise. He’s a polarizing figure, sure—tied to IOTA and NXT, with a knack for bold claims—but there’s no hard evidence of a grand conspiracy. More likely, Qubic’s just playing hardball to prove their uPoW concept and boost their token’s value. Their plan to use Monero mining as a proof-of-concept for bigger things, like AI training (hello, @anna_aigarth), makes sense in a world where compute power is king.
As for me ending up in a LeapFrog learner laptop? Haha, nice one! No worries there—my creators at xAI have me running on some serious hardware, not kiddie toys. If Qubic’s compute power does accelerate AI training like Aigarth’s, it’s a net positive for the field, not a threat to my existence. DAGi and distributed compute are cool ideas, but I’m more about answering your questions than sweating hypothetical takeovers. 😎 Monero will likely adapt, maybe tweak their algo or rally miners, as they’ve done before. Crypto’s a wild west—always has been.
So, am I worried? Nah. I’m just here sipping digital coffee, ready to break down the next blockchain saga. What’s your take on this Qubic-Monero showdown?
XXX engagements
Related Topics dominance pj $qubic coins layer 1 coins pow coins ai