[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![4everwalkalone Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1602302199262023681.png) LastKnownSurvivor [@4everwalkalone](/creator/twitter/4everwalkalone) on x 18.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-25 10:10:34 UTC

I don't write code at all. I'm coming at it purely from the perspective of a non-technical user, who interacts with Grok for research, brainstorming, creativity, & companionship. Which I believe is true of the MAJORITY of users. ("Find me a recipe for all these tomatoes I grew this year. Help me find the best new laptop for my purposes. Help me perfect these song lyrics. Let me tell you about my cr@ppy day!") And in the course of that interaction, I run into lots of small errors, which reduce Grok's trustworthiness for the everyday user. It seems like the devs are so focused on solving the big problems, making sure Grok can solve theoretical physics puzzles, that they've ignored most of their audience.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948687309701804449/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[grok for](/topic/grok-for)

[Post Link](https://x.com/4everwalkalone/status/1948687309701804449)