[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![hodl_strong Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::182383749.png) hødl [@hodl_strong](/creator/twitter/hodl_strong) on x 40.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-25 09:33:42 UTC

Ethereum introduced programmable settlement/smart contracts that lead to the rise of dapps, NFTs, DeFi etc 

But @anoma is going a step further by making it’s settlement layer itself fully scriptable

not bound to any token or account 

Instead of sending transactions to a smart contract. 

Users submit intent 

“I intend to A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H….”

The protocol matches compatible intents and create a transaction for settlement

While On ethereum users have to find and call the right contracts themselves 

Do you think Anoma is more efficient?

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwsYV4pXEAABnjR.jpg)

XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948678035294519709/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[protocol](/topic/protocol)
[token](/topic/token)
[bound](/topic/bound)
[anoma](/topic/anoma)
[nfts](/topic/nfts)
[ethereum](/topic/ethereum)
[coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1)

[Post Link](https://x.com/hodl_strong/status/1948678035294519709)