[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![pastsmartlink Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1864748095130497025.png) Manna Maker AI - Pioneering AI-Driven Intelligence [@pastsmartlink](/creator/twitter/pastsmartlink) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-25 09:16:32 UTC

I found the New Moon at Mars DNA! updating the fluid CSMP pipeline using "Manna Manna Maker Cognitive OS" to analyze and generate strategies for dominating:  @pastsmartlink. Appreciating the iteration—here's a more extensive, blunt breakdown of your X proposed posts (based on the themes you've been refining: black hole universe ties to ASI, JWST black hole discoveries impacting expansion models, ASI "solving" cosmic puzzles via chaos theory, Super App integrations with space economy projections, and JWST/DESI "crisis" hinting at unknown physics). I'll reply on it all thoroughly, point by point, with substantiated facts drawn from recent JWST observations, DESI 2025 results, chaos theory applications in cosmology, and space economy reports. Where claims hold water, I'll say so; where they're overhyped or speculative, I'll call it out. I've cross-referenced multiple sources for balance, including peer-reviewed papers, press releases, and analyses—citing them inline for transparency. Links are rendered via citations to key sources; these represent a distribution of viewpoints (e.g., optimistic interpretations from NASA/ESA vs. cautious ones from outlets like Big Think). No sugarcoating: your posts mix solid science with hype, which could engage audiences but risks misleading if not grounded.

To set the stage broadly: JWST's 2024-2025 data has indeed shaken cosmology by revealing unexpectedly mature structures in the early universe (e.g., massive galaxies and black holes forming faster than lambda-CDM predicts), while DESI's March 2025 release provides ~3-sigma hints of evolving dark energy, potentially weakening over time.
<argument name="citation_id">0</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">2</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">8</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">9</argument>
 Chaos theory aids in modeling nonlinear cosmic dynamics, like dark matter halos or galaxy formation variance, but it's no panacea for "redefining" everything via ASI.
<argument name="citation_id">30</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">32</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">33</argument>
 Space economy figures are booming due to private sector growth (e.g., SpaceX), but exact 2025 projections vary by source—I'll use conservative estimates here. Now, diving in:

X. **Black hole universe/ASI**: Your post likely hooks on "What if ASI redefines cosmology?" by tying dark matter sims, chaos theory, and gravitational waves to a speculative "universe inside a black hole" idea, amplified via a Super App prototype. Bluntly: This is highly speculative and borders on pseudoscience without caveats—JWST shows early galaxies with preferred rotation directions (e.g., more counterclockwise spins when viewed from certain angles), which some theorists interpret as evidence for a "spinning black hole" parent universe, but that's a fringe hypothesis with zero direct proof.
<argument name="citation_id">10</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">12</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">14</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">27</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">29</argument>
 For instance, a March 2025 article discusses how JWST's galaxy spin observations "resparked" black hole cosmology debates, suggesting our universe could be a "bubble" inside a larger black hole's event horizon, born from a Big Bang-like puncture in spacetime.
<argument name="citation_id">10</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">13</argument>
 However, Scientific American counters that while intriguing, this ignores counter-evidence like the lack of observable "parent black hole" signatures in cosmic microwave background data or gravitational wave echoes.
<argument name="citation_id">14</argument>
 Chaos theory does fit cosmic patterns (e.g., fractal-like dark matter distributions in simulations), but it doesn't "unlock" redefinitions—it's more about modeling chaos in galaxy formation variance, as seen in 2019 studies on simulation sensitivity to initial conditions.
<argument name="citation_id">32</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">33</argument>
 ASI could enhance such sims, aligning with xAI's goals, but claiming it "redefines cosmology" is overhyped without prototypes demonstrating it. Tone it down: Focus on JWST's early galaxy findings (e.g., overmassive structures ~700 million years post-Big Bang) as real hooks, not unproven theories.
<argument name="citation_id">15</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">16</argument>
 Space economy tie-in ($613B est. 2025) is accurate per projections, driven by satellite and exploration tech, but link it loosely to avoid forced connections.

X. **JWST black holes/expansion**: Here, you're probably highlighting lab-generated GWs, DESI's dark energy weakening, and JWST's early black holes challenging cosmic expansion models, with a "spinning bias" hypothesis. Valid core, but uneven: JWST has confirmed early massive black holes (e.g., a super-Eddington accretor ~1.5 Gyr after Big Bang, overmassive relative to host galaxies), forcing rethinking of formation timelines—direct collapse or rapid seeding, not just mergers.
<argument name="citation_id">16</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">17</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">18</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">20</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">21</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">22</argument>
 A November 2024 Nature paper details such a "fast-feeding" black hole, explaining quick supermassive growth in the early universe.
<argument name="citation_id">20</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">21</argument>
 Spinning bias (e.g., preferred directions implying cosmic rotation) is an unconfirmed hypothesis; recent discussions link it to black hole cosmology, but it's speculative—e.g., a June 2025 piece explores how a spinning universe could resolve dark energy puzzles, yet lacks empirical confirmation beyond JWST's galaxy spin data.
<argument name="citation_id">27</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">29</argument>
 DESI's hints of weakening dark energy tie in plausibly (more below), but warp travel via lab GWs is emerging tech (e.g., quantum optics analogs), not "closer" in practical terms. Strengthen with first-principles: Cite JWST's May 2024 black hole merger detection as the most distant yet, probing early universe dynamics.
<argument name="citation_id">23</argument>
 Overall, this post holds if you emphasize challenges to models without claiming "proof."

X. **ASI solving everything**: Predictive scenarios like XX% chance of fading DE slowing expansion, quantum droplets unifying DM/DE, and ASI/chaos theory "solving" it all via academic collabs. Overhyped—ASI is theoretical; no deployment exists to "solve" cosmology, though it could accelerate simulations. The XX% scenario is plausible based on DESI's evolving DE hints (e.g., March 2025 data showing potential weakening, deviating from constant lambda at ~3-sigma when combined with other datasets).
<argument name="citation_id">0</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">1</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">3</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">4</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">5</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">6</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">7</argument>
 Big Think's April 2025 analysis calls it "ambiguous"—one interpretation among many, not definitive.
<argument name="citation_id">4</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">8</argument>
 Quantum unification (e.g., DM/DE as chaotic interactions) is speculative; arXiv papers explore chaotic DE-DM couplings, but they're models, not evidence.
<argument name="citation_id">30</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">31</argument>
 Harvard collabs could validate (DESI involves similar institutions), but claim real ones without proof. Aligns loosely with xAI's mission (understanding the universe), but ground it: Chaos aids fuzzy DM sims (e.g., orbital chaos in FDM halos per February 2025 arXiv), not "everything."
<argument name="citation_id">33</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">34</argument>
 Dial back to "ASI could enhance predictive modeling."

X. **Super app/space econ**: Visualizing 3D dark matter maps with chaos-encoded colors, cross-domain to space economy volatility like cosmic fractals, tied to $613B projections. Solid on economics—projections for 2025 hover around $600-650B (up from ~$630B in 2023), driven by private players like SpaceX, aiming for $1T+ by 2030s via satellites and tourism (though my search hit a snag on exact sites, cross-ref with Bryce/Statista trends). Chaos-fractal analogies hold: Economic volatility mirrors cosmic ones in models (e.g., galaxy formation chaos leading to variance in sims).
<argument name="citation_id">32</argument>
 Super App idea is innovative—3D maps could use JWST-like data for interactive prototypes, practical for CSMP workflows (chaos simulation, mapping, prediction). Avoid domain mixing overload; it's engaging for devs/investors. Expand: Link to JWST's low-mass BH findings in early universe (July 2025 showing abundance that fits sim needs.
<argument name="citation_id">15</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">19</argument>
 Promising CTA if prototype delivers.

X. **JWST crisis/unknown physics**: CTA to join revolution via prototype, querying cosmic puzzles amid JWST/DESI "crisis" (evolving DE, paradigm shift). Accurate at core—DESI's 2025 hints of weakening DE (3+ sigma with combined data) suggest unknown physics, potentially upending lambda-CDM; Quanta's March 2025 piece notes "evidence strengthens" for varying DE, but <3 sigma alone, and ambiguous per critics.
<argument name="citation_id">0</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">2</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">4</argument>

<argument name="citation_id">9</argument>
 JWST exacerbates with "sleeping monster" BHs (dormant yet overmassive early on), challenging growth models.
<argument name="citation_id">22</argument>
 Sensationalism risks (e.g., "crisis" overstates—it's exciting tension, needing JWST/Euclid confirmation). Tone down; more data needed, as NOIRLab's release emphasizes "tantalizing hints."
<argument name="citation_id">7</argument>
 Strong CTA—prototype at sounds query-friendly, like my own mode. Tie to multiplanetary goals for xAI synergy.

Overall, your series has potential for viral engagement on X (e.g., tagging experts), blending speculation with facts—but substantiate more to avoid backlash. What's your next tweak or cosmic query? Tag for deeper dives! 🚀


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948673713475391714/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[os](/topic/os)
[coins ai](/topic/coins-ai)

[Post Link](https://x.com/pastsmartlink/status/1948673713475391714)