[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  EuropeanPowell [@EuropeanPowell](/creator/twitter/EuropeanPowell) on x 44K followers Created: 2025-07-25 08:06:46 UTC It is not mentioned in the @guardian article, but it is extremely important to know that on XX January 2025 Keir Starmer’s government announced the creation of deregulated AI Growth Zones. Both the US and the UK refused to sign for the EU’s proposed AI regulatory framework at the Paris AI Safety Summit earlier this year. The UK and US Position: - US Vice President JD Vance emphasised concerns about excessive regulation stifling innovation, warning that stringent regulations could “kill a transformative industry” and criticised European regulatory frameworks for imposing “massive regulations” and creating “endless legal compliance costs” - A UK spokesperson said “the declaration didn’t provide enough practical clarity on global governance and didn’t sufficiently address harder questions around national security” The Regulatory Divergence: The contrast is stark when considering that the European Union has already enacted the most comprehensive, broad, overarching law on the use and development of artificial intelligence of any area in the world through the EU AI Act, while the US and UK are pursuing what Vance called a “hands-off” approach to regulation. My point is about Trump and Starmer are both enabling “impacts prohibited under EU law”. The EU AI Act includes specific prohibitions and risk-based restrictions that wouldn’t apply to AI development and deployment in the UK and US. This regulatory arbitrage will allow practices that the EU has deemed too risky or ethically problematic. Starmer's Labour Party are dragging the UK into a big tech deregulated dystopia where zoning carves up Britain into competing corporate feudal enclaves with laws and regulations different from the host country. Palantir has XX contracts with UK public institutions, the NHS, the Ministry of Defence, the Police force, the Cabinet Office, and the Department of Levelling Up and Housing and Communities (DLUHC). Keir Starmer awarded a new contract to Palantir with Coventry City Council this year. Palantir and the IDF The Israeli military has developed AI systems like “Lavender”, “Gospel” and “Where’s Daddy?” to process data and generate lists of targets, reshaping modern warfare and illustrating AI’s dual-use nature. Palantir Technology Inc., whose tech collaboration with Israel long predates October 2023, expanded its support to the Israeli military post-October 2023. There are reasonable grounds to believe Palantir has provided automatic predictive policing technology, core defence infrastructure for rapid and scaled-up construction and deployment of military software, and its Artificial Intelligence Platform, which allows real-time battlefield data integration for automated decision-making.  XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [jd vance](/topic/jd-vance) [vice](/topic/vice) [paris](/topic/paris) [coins ai](/topic/coins-ai) [keir](/topic/keir) [Post Link](https://x.com/EuropeanPowell/status/1948656156156604641)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
EuropeanPowell @EuropeanPowell on x 44K followers
Created: 2025-07-25 08:06:46 UTC
It is not mentioned in the @guardian article, but it is extremely important to know that on XX January 2025 Keir Starmer’s government announced the creation of deregulated AI Growth Zones.
Both the US and the UK refused to sign for the EU’s proposed AI regulatory framework at the Paris AI Safety Summit earlier this year.
The UK and US Position: - US Vice President JD Vance emphasised concerns about excessive regulation stifling innovation, warning that stringent regulations could “kill a transformative industry” and criticised European regulatory frameworks for imposing “massive regulations” and creating “endless legal compliance costs”
XXXXX engagements
/post/tweet::1948656156156604641