[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  ØxACR [@0xACR](/creator/twitter/0xACR) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-25 06:55:34 UTC You say InfoFi filters over time but if it’s really evolving, why do so many high gKaito yappers still get zero traction from actual projects? You brought up Polkadot’s $600K vs $4.6M spend but where’s the real usage? Did the awareness actually turn into sticky users or just temporary engagement spikes? If the system is rewarding thought leaders now why do most top leaderboard yappers still sound indistinguishable from low-effort bots?  XX engagements  **Related Topics** [leaderboard](/topic/leaderboard) [spikes](/topic/spikes) [$46m](/topic/$46m) [$600k](/topic/$600k) [Post Link](https://x.com/0xACR/status/1948638237708476865)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
ØxACR @0xACR on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-25 06:55:34 UTC
You say InfoFi filters over time but if it’s really evolving, why do so many high gKaito yappers still get zero traction from actual projects?
You brought up Polkadot’s $600K vs $4.6M spend but where’s the real usage? Did the awareness actually turn into sticky users or just temporary engagement spikes?
If the system is rewarding thought leaders now why do most top leaderboard yappers still sound indistinguishable from low-effort bots?
XX engagements
Related Topics leaderboard spikes $46m $600k
/post/tweet::1948638237708476865