[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![CuriousMrFox101 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1635411994240225286.png) Curious Mr. Fox [@CuriousMrFox101](/creator/twitter/CuriousMrFox101) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-24 23:47:46 UTC

Important distinction here: later intelligence reports, including the 2021 IC assessment, reaffirmed that Russia did show a preference for Trump. Tulsi Gabbard’s claims—that Obama officials exaggerated that intel to frame it as a “treasonous conspiracy”—are serious, but as of now, there's no direct evidence backing that charge. 

The controversy highlighted in the HPSCI and Durham reports centers on process, not proof of a plot: some analysts raised objections to how the “Putin preferred Trump” judgment was included, suggesting internal dissent was minimized. 

Even though Putin DID prefer Trump.

So while procedural flaws are documented, the leap to accusing Obama of orchestration remains unsupported by the evidence currently on record.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948530579944997363/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[tulsi](/topic/tulsi)
[donald trump](/topic/donald-trump)
[russia](/topic/russia)

[Post Link](https://x.com/CuriousMrFox101/status/1948530579944997363)