[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Right Blend [@rightblend](/creator/twitter/rightblend) on x 37.3K followers Created: 2025-07-24 20:09:17 UTC 45/ Crown: specifically in regard to Charter. Yesterday Magas went to cases with less or equal punishment like trafficking; only comparable cases can be compared ... The crown is seeking a sentence in the range prescribed by parliament. Crown: A certain number of Mr Greenspon submissions go against findings of trial. Ms Lich was prosecuted for means and found guilty as a principal, not just party. At para XXX of your decision Lich is soliciting funding. At one point, she says please donate and help us and keep the protest going as long as its going to [stand up]. Your honour makes it clear the meaning is to help the protest stay in Ottawa and ... block the roads. While Ms Lich is not blocking the road, your honour found numerous ways her honours correlated to what's happening on the ground at para XXX of your decision, 323, 324, and XXX. In XXX your honour said Ms Lich was also the voice of freedom convoy not only as its president but as its leader so when she said hold the line [she meant it]... point to that (j: I found it meant different things) when you found it for obstruction you found it for obstruct, for believes and for mischief... (j: When I found her talking to other people... [responding to people saying it to her and saying it back]) With respect to the mischief your honour made several finding of it relating to people staying in place Crown: Greenspon said no case like this... In Von Huigenbos, found to be working with the police at para XXX and XXX of that case the court found the Huigenbos argued the court will sentence him for talking to police. That's wrong. He's punished for his role in the blockade... the only aggravating factor is the role he took. The only mitigating factors is when he assisted the officers. crown: there are mitigating factors in respect to Jansen. During blockade, he helped move rcmp. He received custodial Greenspon: Except I didnt say that. I said there was no case of working with police to lower the impact of [others means[ (j: well in coutts... found to help being move trucks) Magas: As were all objecting [missed it] Crown: Both Magas and Greenspon made submissions of positive impacts... Mr Greenspon is imploring this court to look at many positive impacts. Many of these letters speak highly of what this court has found to be mass mischief so they are supportive of criminal offence found guilty. Were not here to sentence them.. for their believes. We're here to sentence for criminal actions Crown: Defence submissions take focus off what the sentence is about. We're not here because Lich and Barber helped people but the significant harm their actions caused to many residents in this city. They may describe it as a love fest but many disagree. [IF THE CROWN REPRESENTS SO MUCH NEGATIVITY, HOW COME THEY HAVE ONLY OLD DUSTY REUSED IMPACT STATEMENTS FROM CIVIL SUIT AND PAT KING?] XXXXX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/rightblend/status/1948475594619961668)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Right Blend @rightblend on x 37.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-24 20:09:17 UTC
45/ Crown: specifically in regard to Charter. Yesterday Magas went to cases with less or equal punishment like trafficking; only comparable cases can be compared
... The crown is seeking a sentence in the range prescribed by parliament.
Crown: A certain number of Mr Greenspon submissions go against findings of trial. Ms Lich was prosecuted for means and found guilty as a principal, not just party. At para XXX of your decision Lich is soliciting funding. At one point, she says please donate and help us and keep the protest going as long as its going to [stand up]. Your honour makes it clear the meaning is to help the protest stay in Ottawa and ... block the roads. While Ms Lich is not blocking the road, your honour found numerous ways her honours correlated to what's happening on the ground at para XXX of your decision, 323, 324, and XXX.
In XXX your honour said Ms Lich was also the voice of freedom convoy not only as its president but as its leader so when she said hold the line [she meant it]... point to that (j: I found it meant different things) when you found it for obstruction you found it for obstruct, for believes and for mischief... (j: When I found her talking to other people... [responding to people saying it to her and saying it back]) With respect to the mischief your honour made several finding of it relating to people staying in place
Crown: Greenspon said no case like this... In Von Huigenbos, found to be working with the police at para XXX and XXX of that case the court found the Huigenbos argued the court will sentence him for talking to police. That's wrong. He's punished for his role in the blockade... the only aggravating factor is the role he took. The only mitigating factors is when he assisted the officers.
crown: there are mitigating factors in respect to Jansen. During blockade, he helped move rcmp. He received custodial
Greenspon: Except I didnt say that. I said there was no case of working with police to lower the impact of [others means[ (j: well in coutts... found to help being move trucks)
Magas: As were all objecting [missed it]
Crown: Both Magas and Greenspon made submissions of positive impacts... Mr Greenspon is imploring this court to look at many positive impacts. Many of these letters speak highly of what this court has found to be mass mischief so they are supportive of criminal offence found guilty. Were not here to sentence them.. for their believes. We're here to sentence for criminal actions
Crown: Defence submissions take focus off what the sentence is about. We're not here because Lich and Barber helped people but the significant harm their actions caused to many residents in this city. They may describe it as a love fest but many disagree.
[IF THE CROWN REPRESENTS SO MUCH NEGATIVITY, HOW COME THEY HAVE ONLY OLD DUSTY REUSED IMPACT STATEMENTS FROM CIVIL SUIT AND PAT KING?]
XXXXX engagements
