[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Right Blend [@rightblend](/creator/twitter/rightblend) on x 37.3K followers Created: 2025-07-24 19:03:54 UTC 38/ Granger: Now moving to King. And why I think Ms Lich should be in a different league of moral blameworthiness. (j: It struck me difference of evidence) and Ill spend time in trial decision... and urge to find a difference (j: and I think its important to note the evidence we do have in this trial was Ms Lich and mr Barber were trying to disassociate their activity from King and his activities)... up until the end (even early on) even before arrival... freedom convoy postings on arrival, during, and even as late as Feb XX the day before Ms Lich and Mr Barber speaking of the activities of Pat King and trying to disassociate themselves from that G: With King, there was a finding in para X of sentencing finding there was plan to gridlock. Not the finding here. Para X highlights the planning and premeditation. We have an absence of planning as it related to Lich and Barber (j: the judge found to be not a result of Convoy growing out of control, which I found to be an element) ... in contrast to here [where it got out of control] as opposed to something planned Another finding where the notion from Justice Hackland that Convoy began as lawful protected form of protest that grew out of control and allowed to go on and on and grow into mischief, in my submissions much closer to your honour's findings... his characterization of Mr King and comments your honour made there may have been some change with King (j: I dont know the evidence commenting on decision) when evaluating Lich's moral blameworthiness para XX is a better comparison [convoy began as lawful] as opposed to protest paradigm my cause is above the law I can proceed to achieve my objective XXXXX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/rightblend/status/1948459142848380966)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Right Blend @rightblend on x 37.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-24 19:03:54 UTC
38/ Granger: Now moving to King. And why I think Ms Lich should be in a different league of moral blameworthiness. (j: It struck me difference of evidence) and Ill spend time in trial decision... and urge to find a difference (j: and I think its important to note the evidence we do have in this trial was Ms Lich and mr Barber were trying to disassociate their activity from King and his activities)... up until the end (even early on) even before arrival... freedom convoy postings on arrival, during, and even as late as Feb XX the day before Ms Lich and Mr Barber speaking of the activities of Pat King and trying to disassociate themselves from that
G: With King, there was a finding in para X of sentencing finding there was plan to gridlock. Not the finding here. Para X highlights the planning and premeditation. We have an absence of planning as it related to Lich and Barber (j: the judge found to be not a result of Convoy growing out of control, which I found to be an element) ... in contrast to here [where it got out of control] as opposed to something planned
Another finding where the notion from Justice Hackland that Convoy began as lawful protected form of protest that grew out of control and allowed to go on and on and grow into mischief, in my submissions much closer to your honour's findings... his characterization of Mr King and comments your honour made there may have been some change with King (j: I dont know the evidence commenting on decision) when evaluating Lich's moral blameworthiness para XX is a better comparison [convoy began as lawful] as opposed to protest paradigm my cause is above the law I can proceed to achieve my objective
XXXXX engagements
