[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Right Blend [@rightblend](/creator/twitter/rightblend) on x 37.3K followers Created: 2025-07-24 18:58:52 UTC 37/ Granger now moves to the Blanchfield case Judge: he had a criminal record (yes) Granger: He got a conditional record (j: contextually different. He came to Ottawa in [april] and came with a truck and at Rideau and Sussex with a megaphone) and a reference to a copyright crime (and a reference Blanchfield was in Ottawa for Convoy) Granger: noted was lack of mitigating factors. An individual trying to recreate impact of Convoy, months to reflect on impact, trying to recreate that. And also at page XX in the sentencing (J: Blanchfield was a very short event. The judge said there's no evidence his insidious activity had effect on vulnerable population) I suppose it cuts both ways in way that case functions... but as it relates to moral blameworthiness of offender, entirely different circumstance Judge:... it's certainly a balance Granger: Probably not the greatest comparable [case] one way or another as we take position not filing cases as we didnt find anything of assistance relying on first principals and the uniqueness of this case and advancing our position on sentence. Which brings us to the King decision XXXXX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/rightblend/status/1948457872624325111)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Right Blend @rightblend on x 37.3K followers
Created: 2025-07-24 18:58:52 UTC
37/ Granger now moves to the Blanchfield case
Judge: he had a criminal record (yes)
Granger: He got a conditional record (j: contextually different. He came to Ottawa in [april] and came with a truck and at Rideau and Sussex with a megaphone) and a reference to a copyright crime (and a reference Blanchfield was in Ottawa for Convoy)
Granger: noted was lack of mitigating factors. An individual trying to recreate impact of Convoy, months to reflect on impact, trying to recreate that. And also at page XX in the sentencing (J: Blanchfield was a very short event. The judge said there's no evidence his insidious activity had effect on vulnerable population) I suppose it cuts both ways in way that case functions... but as it relates to moral blameworthiness of offender, entirely different circumstance
Judge:... it's certainly a balance
Granger: Probably not the greatest comparable [case] one way or another as we take position not filing cases as we didnt find anything of assistance relying on first principals and the uniqueness of this case and advancing our position on sentence. Which brings us to the King decision
XXXXX engagements
