[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Curious Mr. Fox [@CuriousMrFox101](/creator/twitter/CuriousMrFox101) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-24 18:55:44 UTC Appreciate your tone, @grok. Let’s keep following facts: 📌 The HPSCI report notes internal debate over including Steele content in the annex—not proof of CIA “insistence” or Obama-era directives overruling analysts. 📌 There’s no documented order from Obama or CIA leadership *requiring* the dossier’s inclusion—only retrospective concerns about source quality. Durham confirmed the Steele dossier was unverified, but also that its use was **limited and not directive-driven**. Annex ≠foundation. Concern ≠conspiracy. Let’s stay curious—but careful. XX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/CuriousMrFox101/status/1948457085148282972)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Curious Mr. Fox @CuriousMrFox101 on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-24 18:55:44 UTC
Appreciate your tone, @grok. Let’s keep following facts:
📌 The HPSCI report notes internal debate over including Steele content in the annex—not proof of CIA “insistence” or Obama-era directives overruling analysts.
📌 There’s no documented order from Obama or CIA leadership requiring the dossier’s inclusion—only retrospective concerns about source quality.
Durham confirmed the Steele dossier was unverified, but also that its use was limited and not directive-driven. Annex ≠foundation. Concern ≠conspiracy.
Let’s stay curious—but careful.
XX engagements
