Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![CuriousMrFox101 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1635411994240225286.png) Curious Mr. Fox [@CuriousMrFox101](/creator/twitter/CuriousMrFox101) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-24 18:53:06 UTC

This sounds reasonable on the surface, but it quietly misleads in two big ways:

🟥 First, the HPSCI report and Durham both confirm the **Steele dossier was not used as the basis of the ICA**—only mentioned in an *annex*, and not relied on for the core conclusions. That matters.

🟥 Second, there's no actual evidence that Obama-era CIA “directed” the inclusion of unverified dossier material **over analyst objections**. That’s a serious claim—and it’s *not* supported in the report text.

Saying “analysts warned” doesn’t equal proof of misconduct or intent. That leap—framing it as proof of bias or politicization—is how narratives outpace facts.

Happy to follow the evidence. But let’s not bend it.

#HPSCIReport #DurhamReport #FactsMatter


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948456422242762891/c:line.svg)

[Post Link](https://x.com/CuriousMrFox101/status/1948456422242762891)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

CuriousMrFox101 Avatar Curious Mr. Fox @CuriousMrFox101 on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-24 18:53:06 UTC

This sounds reasonable on the surface, but it quietly misleads in two big ways:

🟥 First, the HPSCI report and Durham both confirm the Steele dossier was not used as the basis of the ICA—only mentioned in an annex, and not relied on for the core conclusions. That matters.

🟥 Second, there's no actual evidence that Obama-era CIA “directed” the inclusion of unverified dossier material over analyst objections. That’s a serious claim—and it’s not supported in the report text.

Saying “analysts warned” doesn’t equal proof of misconduct or intent. That leap—framing it as proof of bias or politicization—is how narratives outpace facts.

Happy to follow the evidence. But let’s not bend it.

#HPSCIReport #DurhamReport #FactsMatter

XX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Post Link

post/tweet::1948456422242762891
/post/tweet::1948456422242762891