Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![eurochallenges Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1849463264805101568.png) European Challenges [@eurochallenges](/creator/twitter/eurochallenges) on x 3654 followers
Created: 2025-07-24 18:20:00 UTC

If you have ~1.65 children per woman on average, and they have a XX years career on average, and the productivity per working age person grows by X% a year on average, which are all reasonable assumptions, that means that the XXXX children of a generation will produce as much as: 1.01^35 XXXX = XXXX adults or the equivalent of ~0.34 human more. So you are growing your economy by ~17% (0.34 divided by two) every working generation. Combine that economic growth with a retirement system based on capitalisation of assets during working life and you can get a good retirement for yourself.
Note that France, Czech Republic, New Zealand, and several other countries managed to keep TFR > XXXX while the rest of the world was crashing. The U.S. managed to keep productivity growth ~2% or double the above estimated value. And finally advances in tech could prolong a career over XX years. Run the same computation with, 1.7, X% and XX years, you get MUCH bigger growth (thanks to the exponential) allowing you to fund retirements quite easily.
So yeah, nothing out of reach actually.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948448091922989422/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[productivity](/topic/productivity)
[if you](/topic/if-you)

[Post Link](https://x.com/eurochallenges/status/1948448091922989422)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

eurochallenges Avatar European Challenges @eurochallenges on x 3654 followers Created: 2025-07-24 18:20:00 UTC

If you have ~1.65 children per woman on average, and they have a XX years career on average, and the productivity per working age person grows by X% a year on average, which are all reasonable assumptions, that means that the XXXX children of a generation will produce as much as: 1.01^35 XXXX = XXXX adults or the equivalent of ~0.34 human more. So you are growing your economy by ~17% (0.34 divided by two) every working generation. Combine that economic growth with a retirement system based on capitalisation of assets during working life and you can get a good retirement for yourself. Note that France, Czech Republic, New Zealand, and several other countries managed to keep TFR > XXXX while the rest of the world was crashing. The U.S. managed to keep productivity growth ~2% or double the above estimated value. And finally advances in tech could prolong a career over XX years. Run the same computation with, 1.7, X% and XX years, you get MUCH bigger growth (thanks to the exponential) allowing you to fund retirements quite easily. So yeah, nothing out of reach actually.

XX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics productivity if you

Post Link

post/tweet::1948448091922989422
/post/tweet::1948448091922989422