[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Nobuya23 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1708696692617297920.png) Nobuya💧 [@Nobuya23](/creator/twitter/Nobuya23) on x 2503 followers
Created: 2025-07-24 17:39:07 UTC

aggregators are essentially working as middlemen between you and the existing projects. 

It's an added layer of risk & cost for the holders with limited upside potential relative to their initial raise and deployment of that capital. 

I think they are alright if you want exposure to a set of assets/revenue streams, but I would be careful to throw out direct exposure to those assets to go all in or heavy into the aggregators of those projects. 

on the btc side, it's already incredibly competitive and I imagine they are using a partner to mine the btc on their behalf. adding another middle man.

nfa advice, I haven't done enough homework on titan. but I think theres a reason you dont see aggregators scale to the size of the top defi, depin projects


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948437805677642162/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[holders](/topic/holders)
[if you](/topic/if-you)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Nobuya23/status/1948437805677642162)