[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Dave Greene [@GreeneMan6](/creator/twitter/GreeneMan6) on x 26.9K followers Created: 2025-07-24 13:48:51 UTC The problem with @ItIsHoeMath ‘s criticism of women who say “I am the table” when asked “what do you bring to the table?” is that the language / frame makes the problem of female narcissism seem less solvable than it really jazz For example, I know deeply generous sacrificial traditional women who give everything to their families who in fact might say something like “I am the table!” When asked “what do you bring to the table?”. The issue is that when women ask men “what do you bring to the table?” they are using transactional language for a relationship that they want to be sacred, they are asking “what are you doing to woo me? What is the masculine energy that will tame my female spirit?” The female mind rebels when the question is turned back on her. “What? Is this some kind of exchange? Am I a whore that dances for you?” Ladies are won. Whores transact. She won’t say it, but that’s what her body is thinking. Women view relationships as spiritual. They will sacrifice for them, but they won’t transact, even if you could describe successful relationships as transactions from the outside. For instance, religions do this too. They have covenants with the divine which are (in the broadest sense) transactional, each side gets something. But ask a priest “what does God bring to the table?” And the priest will say some variation of “God IS the table!”. XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [women](/topic/women) [$dave](/topic/$dave) [Post Link](https://x.com/GreeneMan6/status/1948379855495852191)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Dave Greene @GreeneMan6 on x 26.9K followers
Created: 2025-07-24 13:48:51 UTC
The problem with @ItIsHoeMath ‘s criticism of women who say “I am the table” when asked “what do you bring to the table?” is that the language / frame makes the problem of female narcissism seem less solvable than it really jazz
For example, I know deeply generous sacrificial traditional women who give everything to their families who in fact might say something like “I am the table!” When asked “what do you bring to the table?”.
The issue is that when women ask men “what do you bring to the table?” they are using transactional language for a relationship that they want to be sacred, they are asking “what are you doing to woo me? What is the masculine energy that will tame my female spirit?”
The female mind rebels when the question is turned back on her. “What? Is this some kind of exchange? Am I a whore that dances for you?” Ladies are won. Whores transact. She won’t say it, but that’s what her body is thinking.
Women view relationships as spiritual. They will sacrifice for them, but they won’t transact, even if you could describe successful relationships as transactions from the outside. For instance, religions do this too. They have covenants with the divine which are (in the broadest sense) transactional, each side gets something. But ask a priest “what does God bring to the table?” And the priest will say some variation of “God IS the table!”.
XXXXXX engagements
