[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![pro_pavlik Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1413077651649073155.png) PAVLIK [@pro_pavlik](/creator/twitter/pro_pavlik) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-24 12:01:00 UTC

🚨From XX to XX while staying loyal to @Polkadot 

Every XX hours another drop.

From #36 to #51 in two days. No breaks. Just down.

I've been creating content about Polkadot for five months straight.

No “one-off mentions” just consistency, focus, and real engagement.

Not because I had to. Because I genuinely care.

But now, everything I do just leads to falling.

And that would be fine if it made sense.

Yet at the top, I see accounts that mentioned Polkadot once or twice.

No pattern. No value. Just reach.

This is the @KaitoAI  leaderboard.

And more and more, I notice unfairness.

Sometimes it's explainable. Sometimes not at all.

If the algorithm values consistency,
why have so many of my friends who contributed for months already dropped out?

If it values contribution, why are those still in who are clearly just checking a box?
I’m not complaining.

I’m still here.

But I do wonder what exactly counts as contribution now?

Manual curation? New filters? Just more competition?

I’d really like to understand the rules so I can play fair.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwnwV5YXEAEYYvT.jpg)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948352714074636472/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[mentions](/topic/mentions)

[Post Link](https://x.com/pro_pavlik/status/1948352714074636472)