Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Marcorio61O Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::2721525935.png) marco orio [@Marcorio61O](/creator/twitter/Marcorio61O) on x 8775 followers
Created: 2025-07-24 10:28:24 UTC

🇺🇸⚖️ Candace Owens vs Macron: a legal and political firestorm

Candace Owens has ignited global controversy after being sued by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte in a U.S. court. The lawsuit, XXX pages long, accuses Owens of defamation for spreading false and offensive claims that Brigitte Macron was born male — a conspiracy theory Owens repeated in her podcast series Becoming Brigitte.

📌 Key facts:

Owens alleges Brigitte Macron was born “Jean-Michel,” her brother — linking the theory to broader claims involving incest and the CIA.
The Macrons describe the accusations as “verifiably false and devastating,” designed to humiliate them on a global scale.
The couple filed suit in the state of Delaware, choosing U.S. jurisdiction given the reach and impact of Owens’ audience.
Macron’s lawyer emphasized that Owens’ statements were “malicious and knowingly false”, meeting the high legal threshold required for defamation involving public figures.
Owens, in response, stated: “I think you’re sick. I think you’re disgusting. And I am ready to take this battle on behalf of the entire world.” She claims the lawsuit is an attack on her First Amendment rights.

⚖️ Why it matters:

It is highly unusual for a head of state to sue an influencer, especially in a foreign court.
The case could set a major precedent on the limits of free speech and the accountability of high-profile content creators.
It exposes how disinformation can escalate into international legal conflicts, especially when amplified by massive online platforms.

🎯 In summary:

This is no ordinary internet drama — it’s a direct clash between freedom of expression and the legal limits of defamation. Owens may have crossed a line that could cost her dearly, and the outcome of this case might reshape how social media is used (and abused) in international politics.

🌍 In an age of global digital warfare, this lawsuit may become a turning point for how the internet is regulated when reputations and institutions are under attack.

#CandaceOwens #Macron #BrigitteMacron #Defamation #FreeSpeech #FakeNews #FirstAmendment 👇

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwnbQvFW0AAyp6i.jpg)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948329412295880955/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[candace owens](/topic/candace-owens)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Marcorio61O/status/1948329412295880955)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

Marcorio61O Avatar marco orio @Marcorio61O on x 8775 followers Created: 2025-07-24 10:28:24 UTC

🇺🇸⚖️ Candace Owens vs Macron: a legal and political firestorm

Candace Owens has ignited global controversy after being sued by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte in a U.S. court. The lawsuit, XXX pages long, accuses Owens of defamation for spreading false and offensive claims that Brigitte Macron was born male — a conspiracy theory Owens repeated in her podcast series Becoming Brigitte.

📌 Key facts:

Owens alleges Brigitte Macron was born “Jean-Michel,” her brother — linking the theory to broader claims involving incest and the CIA. The Macrons describe the accusations as “verifiably false and devastating,” designed to humiliate them on a global scale. The couple filed suit in the state of Delaware, choosing U.S. jurisdiction given the reach and impact of Owens’ audience. Macron’s lawyer emphasized that Owens’ statements were “malicious and knowingly false”, meeting the high legal threshold required for defamation involving public figures. Owens, in response, stated: “I think you’re sick. I think you’re disgusting. And I am ready to take this battle on behalf of the entire world.” She claims the lawsuit is an attack on her First Amendment rights.

⚖️ Why it matters:

It is highly unusual for a head of state to sue an influencer, especially in a foreign court. The case could set a major precedent on the limits of free speech and the accountability of high-profile content creators. It exposes how disinformation can escalate into international legal conflicts, especially when amplified by massive online platforms.

🎯 In summary:

This is no ordinary internet drama — it’s a direct clash between freedom of expression and the legal limits of defamation. Owens may have crossed a line that could cost her dearly, and the outcome of this case might reshape how social media is used (and abused) in international politics.

🌍 In an age of global digital warfare, this lawsuit may become a turning point for how the internet is regulated when reputations and institutions are under attack.

#CandaceOwens #Macron #BrigitteMacron #Defamation #FreeSpeech #FakeNews #FirstAmendment 👇

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics candace owens

Post Link

post/tweet::1948329412295880955
/post/tweet::1948329412295880955