Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![anton_mich82426 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1684836156578426880.png) Dr Anton Micheal [@anton_mich82426](/creator/twitter/anton_mich82426) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-24 08:04:23 UTC

X. Thesis Validation
✅ Supporting Arguments
Innovative platform: Engineered human tissue scaffolds could disrupt high-value markets in vascular and organ regeneration.
Low capex burn: With capex near $X M/year but burn ~–$100 M, planners suggest spending conservatively.
Strong liquidity buffer: Cash (~$45–63 M) and modest debt buy time for clinical milestones.
⚠️ Counterarguments & Risks
Severe cash burn & low revenue: TTM revenue ~$4 M vs cash burn near $XXX M → likely dilution or capital raises.
Valuation stretched: EV/Revenue ~75× vs biotech peers; high risk if pipeline delays occur.
🔍 Verdict
Neutral / Cautious: Unique tech and meaningful clinical upside, but precarious financials and high valuation leave minimal margin of safety. 
Is there something in Phase 3?

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gwm3XEdXAAEh8cQ.jpg)

XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948293167637266716/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[100m](/topic/100m)
[debt](/topic/debt)
[$4563m](/topic/$4563m)
[$100m](/topic/$100m)
[$2myear](/topic/$2myear)
[$issc](/topic/$issc)

[Post Link](https://x.com/anton_mich82426/status/1948293167637266716)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

anton_mich82426 Avatar Dr Anton Micheal @anton_mich82426 on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-24 08:04:23 UTC

X. Thesis Validation ✅ Supporting Arguments Innovative platform: Engineered human tissue scaffolds could disrupt high-value markets in vascular and organ regeneration. Low capex burn: With capex near $X M/year but burn –$100 M, planners suggest spending conservatively. Strong liquidity buffer: Cash ($45–63 M) and modest debt buy time for clinical milestones. ⚠️ Counterarguments & Risks Severe cash burn & low revenue: TTM revenue ~$4 M vs cash burn near $XXX M → likely dilution or capital raises. Valuation stretched: EV/Revenue ~75× vs biotech peers; high risk if pipeline delays occur. 🔍 Verdict Neutral / Cautious: Unique tech and meaningful clinical upside, but precarious financials and high valuation leave minimal margin of safety. Is there something in Phase 3?

XX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics 100m debt $4563m $100m $2myear $issc

Post Link

post/tweet::1948293167637266716
/post/tweet::1948293167637266716