[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Aespann_jeans [@a1071364](/creator/twitter/a1071364) on x 13.1K followers Created: 2025-07-24 07:35:28 UTC The NewJeans members' side each conducted a 30-minute presentation to make their arguments. Before the substantive arguments began, the NewJeans members' side requested the court, "We have no issue with submitting illegally obtained evidence to the court, but we ask that it not be mentioned during the public trial process." After the court accepted this request, during the subsequent arguments, when ADOR's side mentioned a KakaoTalk conversation between former CEO Min Hee-jin and an acquaintance, in which she said, "We’re taking (NewJeans) after three years," the members' side objected, stating, "We repeatedly asked that such evidence not be presented in open court, yet it is being intentionally disclosed in a public trial." However, the court responded, "I know about it, so how could the reporters not know?" Despite this, the members' side continued to protest. The court then dismissed their objections, saying, "How can you interrupt the argument process like this? Please refrain. The allegations of taking [NewJeans] are something we’ve all heard before."  XXXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [newjeans](/topic/newjeans) [Post Link](https://x.com/a1071364/status/1948285893208396279)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Aespann_jeans @a1071364 on x 13.1K followers
Created: 2025-07-24 07:35:28 UTC
The NewJeans members' side each conducted a 30-minute presentation to make their arguments. Before the substantive arguments began, the NewJeans members' side requested the court, "We have no issue with submitting illegally obtained evidence to the court, but we ask that it not be mentioned during the public trial process."
After the court accepted this request, during the subsequent arguments, when ADOR's side mentioned a KakaoTalk conversation between former CEO Min Hee-jin and an acquaintance, in which she said, "We’re taking (NewJeans) after three years," the members' side objected, stating, "We repeatedly asked that such evidence not be presented in open court, yet it is being intentionally disclosed in a public trial."
However, the court responded, "I know about it, so how could the reporters not know?" Despite this, the members' side continued to protest. The court then dismissed their objections, saying, "How can you interrupt the argument process like this? Please refrain. The allegations of taking [NewJeans] are something we’ve all heard before."
XXXXXXX engagements
Related Topics newjeans