[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![SeriousStuff42 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1845717144304050191.png) Johannes Miertschischk [@SeriousStuff42](/creator/twitter/SeriousStuff42) on x 1371 followers
Created: 2025-07-24 07:00:56 UTC

Constantly claiming that AI models will achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI) while simultaneously pointing out that there is no clear definition for the term AGI clearly shows that they are trying to fool people:

The only meaningful benchmark for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is human general intelligence, which is defined primarily by an outstanding ability to generalize.

Applied to Large Language Models (LLMs), this would correspond to their data efficiency. 
The data efficiency of Large Language Models (LLMs) is very low and fundamentally limited.

Therefore, for technical reasons, transformer-based AI-models (Large Language Models like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Lama, Grok etc.) will never even come close to anything resembling general intelligence.

These are easily verifiable facts!


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948277199234056570/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[fool](/topic/fool)
[agi](/topic/agi)
[artificial](/topic/artificial)
[coins ai](/topic/coins-ai)

[Post Link](https://x.com/SeriousStuff42/status/1948277199234056570)