[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  zacks.eth [@0xzxch](/creator/twitter/0xzxch) on x 1420 followers Created: 2025-07-24 06:54:43 UTC EXTREME TAKE: (Even going against my past conclusions) 🤷♂️ Both kfpepe and Cryptopunks (and everything in-between Peperium & Curios) are 1/1s. There is only X hash in all of these contracts with ZERO ways to verify an individual token contains ownership to a specified image/hash/content. If this does not exist, why should we be assuming MULTIPLE pieces of content exist? There is only X piece of content, it's the singular data hash. Then there are a bunch of either fungible tokens (Peperium & Curio) or nonfungible indexes (Cryptopunks). These tokens represent nothing but ownership in the contract. In these cases, what the contracts are, is similar, but slightly different varieties of, singular content fulfilling preservations. Therefore when you buy for example Curio1, you would own 1/100,000 of the total locked supply which represents that 1/1 content. When you buy kfpepe, you buy 1/5 (20%) stake in that total locked supply of X tokens that represent ownership in that content data preserving smart contract. When you buy CryptoPunks, its slightly different, but almost the same. You are buying X out of 10,000, UNIQUE stakes in the contract data content AND functionality (the marketplace). But you are not getting an individual piece of content, or else there'd be a function called something like "getTokenContentHash". So in conclusion: All these things are 1/1s, it is just a matter of: X. How many holders can there be of this 1/1? (The less the better, a Peperium 1/1 'PEPEGOD' with X total stake token would be pure, no possible fractionalizations in ownership representation) X. Can there be unique token stakes in this 1/1? (CryptoPunks) X. Personal collector preference in the art ✨️ If you read this and want to debate, be my guest. Comment something crazy.  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [token](/topic/token) [cryptopunks](/topic/cryptopunks) [Post Link](https://x.com/0xzxch/status/1948275635018682837)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
zacks.eth @0xzxch on x 1420 followers
Created: 2025-07-24 06:54:43 UTC
EXTREME TAKE: (Even going against my past conclusions) 🤷♂️
Both kfpepe and Cryptopunks (and everything in-between Peperium & Curios) are 1/1s.
There is only X hash in all of these contracts with ZERO ways to verify an individual token contains ownership to a specified image/hash/content. If this does not exist, why should we be assuming MULTIPLE pieces of content exist? There is only X piece of content, it's the singular data hash. Then there are a bunch of either fungible tokens (Peperium & Curio) or nonfungible indexes (Cryptopunks). These tokens represent nothing but ownership in the contract. In these cases, what the contracts are, is similar, but slightly different varieties of, singular content fulfilling preservations.
Therefore when you buy for example Curio1, you would own 1/100,000 of the total locked supply which represents that 1/1 content.
When you buy kfpepe, you buy 1/5 (20%) stake in that total locked supply of X tokens that represent ownership in that content data preserving smart contract.
When you buy CryptoPunks, its slightly different, but almost the same. You are buying X out of 10,000, UNIQUE stakes in the contract data content AND functionality (the marketplace). But you are not getting an individual piece of content, or else there'd be a function called something like "getTokenContentHash".
So in conclusion: All these things are 1/1s, it is just a matter of: X. How many holders can there be of this 1/1? (The less the better, a Peperium 1/1 'PEPEGOD' with X total stake token would be pure, no possible fractionalizations in ownership representation) X. Can there be unique token stakes in this 1/1? (CryptoPunks) X. Personal collector preference in the art ✨️
If you read this and want to debate, be my guest. Comment something crazy.
XXX engagements
Related Topics token cryptopunks