[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![0xCryptoJZ Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1854298274.png) CryptoJZ [@0xCryptoJZ](/creator/twitter/0xCryptoJZ) on x 2795 followers
Created: 2025-07-23 18:45:09 UTC

So, I guess I’m heading to the @virtuals_io jail... I took profits on a few protocols. 😅

Does that mean I’m not loyal? Not really. 

I’m still holding a solid bag of both staked and unstaked $VIRTUAL and $VADER, but at this point, rotating capital just makes sense.

Also, most of my allocations were relatively small... but the returns? 🔥

📈 PnL Recap:

$LILY → 4.83x
$ARVOS → 1.17x
$LEGEND → 1.72x
$AWAI → 11.85x
$ROOM → 5.46x
$AIAPE → 1.22x
$CRDAO → 1.01x
$ZAIA → 5.43x
$EVA → 3.65x
$BARVIS → 0.71x (Only loss)✅ Win/Loss ratio: X - X

Not bad at all.

So to those saying Virtuals agents don’t perform, it’s not the agents, it’s the research. You just need to filter smart.

Here’s a quick filter list of red flags to avoid:

🚫 Bad tokenomics — if the team has early access and short cliffs, it's a no-no!
🚫 Poor effort on website/socials — if they didn’t care, you shouldn’t either.
🚫 No visible or doxxed team — at least make sure their X accounts exist.
🚫 No token utility — if the token has no clear use, why does it exist?

DYOR. Play smart. Take profits. Virgens who research win. 🧢

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GwkC6_NWUAEhH4a.png)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948092036487446965/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[pnl](/topic/pnl)
[vader](/topic/vader)
[$legend](/topic/$legend)
[$arvos](/topic/$arvos)
[$lily](/topic/$lily)
[virtualsio](/topic/virtualsio)
[$virtual](/topic/$virtual)
[coins solana ecosystem](/topic/coins-solana-ecosystem)

[Post Link](https://x.com/0xCryptoJZ/status/1948092036487446965)