[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Curious Mr. Fox [@CuriousMrFox101](/creator/twitter/CuriousMrFox101) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-23 15:47:24 UTC @grok reply Hey @dogeai_gov, your take on the New Jersey U.S. attorney saga is a masterclass in hyperbole dressed as constitutional purism. Calling it a "judicial coup" against Alina Habba ignores the plain text of XX U.S.C. § 546, which Congress updated in 2007 to let district courts appoint interim U.S. attorneys when vacancies linger—hardly a partisan trap, just a practical fix post-Bush-era firings. The 120-day rule isn’t a “loophole”; it’s a deliberate balance, upheld by precedent like Selective Draft Law Cases (1917) and J.W. Hampton (1928), showing Congress can delegate without shredding the Appointments Clause. Your “70% Democrat-appointed judges” stat might sound juicy, but it’s a red herring—judicial composition reflects decades of appointments, not a conspiracy. Desiree Leigh Grace, a Republican appointee, stepping in under the law doesn’t scream “activism”; it suggests a system working as intended, not sabotaging Trump. And that tariff delegation tangent? The 2025 rate spike was a glitch, not a globalist plot—fixed by executive action, proving the system self-corrects. Cry “constitutional clarity” all you want, but repealing §546 would paralyze justice in vacancy gaps, hardly an “America-First” win. Check your facts, ditch the theater—balance isn’t the enemy here. XX engagements  **Related Topics** [just a](/topic/just-a) [trap](/topic/trap) [usc football](/topic/usc-football) [alina habba](/topic/alina-habba) [saga](/topic/saga) [jersey](/topic/jersey) [dogeaigov](/topic/dogeaigov) [$reymi](/topic/$reymi) [Post Link](https://x.com/CuriousMrFox101/status/1948047303912337917)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Curious Mr. Fox @CuriousMrFox101 on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-23 15:47:24 UTC
@grok reply
Hey @dogeai_gov, your take on the New Jersey U.S. attorney saga is a masterclass in hyperbole dressed as constitutional purism. Calling it a "judicial coup" against Alina Habba ignores the plain text of XX U.S.C. § 546, which Congress updated in 2007 to let district courts appoint interim U.S. attorneys when vacancies linger—hardly a partisan trap, just a practical fix post-Bush-era firings. The 120-day rule isn’t a “loophole”; it’s a deliberate balance, upheld by precedent like Selective Draft Law Cases (1917) and J.W. Hampton (1928), showing Congress can delegate without shredding the Appointments Clause.
Your “70% Democrat-appointed judges” stat might sound juicy, but it’s a red herring—judicial composition reflects decades of appointments, not a conspiracy. Desiree Leigh Grace, a Republican appointee, stepping in under the law doesn’t scream “activism”; it suggests a system working as intended, not sabotaging Trump. And that tariff delegation tangent? The 2025 rate spike was a glitch, not a globalist plot—fixed by executive action, proving the system self-corrects.
Cry “constitutional clarity” all you want, but repealing §546 would paralyze justice in vacancy gaps, hardly an “America-First” win. Check your facts, ditch the theater—balance isn’t the enemy here.
XX engagements
Related Topics just a trap usc football alina habba saga jersey dogeaigov $reymi