[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Professor_XN Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1243550330358554631.png) Professor_XN [@Professor_XN](/creator/twitter/Professor_XN) on x 1120 followers
Created: 2025-07-23 15:31:43 UTC

Trying to understand this, but it’s quite hard to

Does this mean that full deployment of zk to show correctness /validity of transaction isn’t a good idea, and should only be deployed active when there’s a potential malicious transaction ?

Here’s what I read into this; megaETH doesn’t really want to spend money on integrating full zk stack into their network, but want to have it as a fail safe in case of emergency 

And that’s completely reasonable, a lot of L2 opts for this option to focus capital on more aspects while still having ZK in their tech

I mean that’s why we have OP (redacted) and then OP (redacted) lite for fraud settlement, both works perfectly 

And that’s good

Also, has there been a testing phase to show how OP Zk lite works on MegaETH or it’s all still a theoretical solution that the team is looking to put in place ? 

@0xSami_M


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1948043355004542979/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[stack](/topic/stack)
[money](/topic/money)
[megaeth](/topic/megaeth)
[theres a](/topic/theres-a)
[zk](/topic/zk)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Professor_XN/status/1948043355004542979)