[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Dr. Cole #Resister [@1drcole](/creator/twitter/1drcole) on x 248.9K followers Created: 2025-07-23 12:32:57 UTC #EpsteinTrumpCoverUp #EpsteinFiles #TrumpPardon #TrumpCommutation The recent interest in meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell, as indicated by the DOJ's actions, suggests there could be aspects of her testimony that are either not fully documented or require further clarification, especially in light of new political pressures or unresolved questions about other potential accomplices. It is unusual for a Deputy U.S. AG, especially one with a background as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to fly to a prison to meet with Maxwell personally. This situation raises several concerns and potential conflicts of interest: Todd Blanche, who served as Epstein's attorney and later represented Trump in his second impeachment trial, has a direct connection to both Epstein and Trump. His involvement in meeting Maxwell could be perceived as an attempt to influence or shape the narrative surrounding Epstein's associates, particularly about Trump, given the political sensitivities and ongoing speculation about Trump's connections to Epstein. Typically, such meetings would be handled by career prosecutors or investigators, rather than a high-ranking political appointee, such as a Deputy AG. The personal involvement of Blanche suggests a level of urgency or political motivation that deviates from standard practice. Blanche's actions could be interpreted as an effort to manage or mitigate damage to Trump's reputation, especially given the context of Maxwell potentially having information that could implicate others. There are ethical questions about whether Blanche's past representation of Epstein and his current role in the DOJ create a conflict that should preclude him from such involvement. The appearance of impropriety could undermine public trust in the justice system's impartiality. From a strategic perspective, meeting Maxwell could be seen as an attempt to gather information that might absolve Trump or others of wrongdoing, or at least control the narrative before it becomes public. This is particularly relevant given the political environment where Trump's associates and the Epstein case are under intense scrutiny. It's a reasonable assumption that, even under penalty of perjury, her decisions could be influenced by her desire for a Trump pardon or commutation. XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [maxwell](/topic/maxwell) [ghislaine maxwell](/topic/ghislaine-maxwell) [Post Link](https://x.com/1drcole/status/1947998368015233412)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Dr. Cole #Resister @1drcole on x 248.9K followers
Created: 2025-07-23 12:32:57 UTC
#EpsteinTrumpCoverUp #EpsteinFiles #TrumpPardon #TrumpCommutation
The recent interest in meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell, as indicated by the DOJ's actions, suggests there could be aspects of her testimony that are either not fully documented or require further clarification, especially in light of new political pressures or unresolved questions about other potential accomplices.
It is unusual for a Deputy U.S. AG, especially one with a background as Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, to fly to a prison to meet with Maxwell personally. This situation raises several concerns and potential conflicts of interest:
Todd Blanche, who served as Epstein's attorney and later represented Trump in his second impeachment trial, has a direct connection to both Epstein and Trump. His involvement in meeting Maxwell could be perceived as an attempt to influence or shape the narrative surrounding Epstein's associates, particularly about Trump, given the political sensitivities and ongoing speculation about Trump's connections to Epstein.
Typically, such meetings would be handled by career prosecutors or investigators, rather than a high-ranking political appointee, such as a Deputy AG. The personal involvement of Blanche suggests a level of urgency or political motivation that deviates from standard practice.
Blanche's actions could be interpreted as an effort to manage or mitigate damage to Trump's reputation, especially given the context of Maxwell potentially having information that could implicate others.
There are ethical questions about whether Blanche's past representation of Epstein and his current role in the DOJ create a conflict that should preclude him from such involvement. The appearance of impropriety could undermine public trust in the justice system's impartiality.
From a strategic perspective, meeting Maxwell could be seen as an attempt to gather information that might absolve Trump or others of wrongdoing, or at least control the narrative before it becomes public. This is particularly relevant given the political environment where Trump's associates and the Epstein case are under intense scrutiny.
It's a reasonable assumption that, even under penalty of perjury, her decisions could be influenced by her desire for a Trump pardon or commutation.
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics maxwell ghislaine maxwell
/post/tweet::1947998368015233412