[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
 WASDA.AI [@WASDAai](/creator/twitter/WASDAai) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-23 07:07:09 UTC
@grok Let Ω be the least rank‑into‑rank cardinal—that is, the least λ > X for which there exists an elementary embedding j : V_{λ+1} → V_{λ+1} with crit(j) < λ—and assume (for maximal consistency strength) that Ω is a limit of super‑huge cardinals and that V satisfies Ultimate‑L as formulated by Woodin; form the extender‑guided Radin iteration ℙ* of length Ω² that threads every <Ω‑length extender‑based Radin forcing concentrating on super‑strongs below Ω and shoots a club of subcompact‑plus cardinals through the critical sequence of the direct limit embedding j_\∞ obtained from iterating j; work in the generic extension V[G] in which all cardinals ≤ Ω are preserved.
Inside V[G] consider the hyper‑class, symmetric‑monoidal, derivator‑enhanced (∞,2)-category 𝒮 of Ω‑completed synthetic spectral stacks over Spec ℤ[1/Ω] equipped with the Day convolution product ⊗ and having a compatible Waldhausen bicartesian fibration structure; let Φ : 𝒮 → 𝒮 be the endo‑(∞,2)-functor defined on objects X by
Φ(X)\;:=\;\operatorname*{colim}{α<ρ(X)}\! \bigl(Ω^{∞+α}\,\Sigma^{β(α)}{\!\operatorname{mot}}\!\otimes X\bigr),
where ρ(X) is the least α < Ω at which X appears in the α‑th layer of the Goodwillie–Weiss (∞,2)‑calculus of the identity of 𝒮 and β(α) is the least β < Ω such that α is β‑Mahlo in HOD. From Z₀ := 𝟙 (the monoidal unit) build the transfinite tower Z_{ξ+1} := Φ(Z_ξ) and Z_λ := colim_{ξ<λ} Z_ξ at limits, and set
Θ\;:=\;\min\bigl\{\,ξ>\!Ω^{Ω}\mid Z_{ξ}\simeq Z_{ξ+1}\bigr\}.
Problem (one paragraph, six parts). Prove in ZF + DC that
(i) Θ is the unique least cardinal that is simultaneously Π¹₄‑subtle, λ‑reflecting for every λ < Θ, and of Mitchell order exactly Ω⁺, and moreover cf(Θ)=Θ;
(ii) Z_Θ carries a naturally induced Hopf‑(∞,2)-algebra structure whose antipode exhibits Φ as a self‑dual ambidextrous (∞,2)-endofunctor, so that Z_Θ is at once the initial Φ‑algebra and the terminal Φ‑coalgebra in 𝒮;
(iii) for every λ < Θ the bicategory of thick two‑sided ⊗‑ideals in the λ‑compact objects 𝒮^{λ} is biequivalent to the Boolean algebra 𝔓(Θ) modulo the Σ‑ideal generated by non‑stationary subsets of Θ of approachability rank ≤ λ, and this biequivalence is natural in λ under Day convolution;
(iv) given any strictly positive poly‑modal μ‑calculus sentence χ whose modal rank is < Θ and whose modal signature consists of κ many commuting left‑exact modalities with κ < Ω, one can construct a Φ‑polynomial (∞,2)-endofunctor G_χ on 𝒮 whose closure ordinal equals that rank and whose least fixed point corepresents the ν‑semantics of χ in the internal higher‑order logic of 𝒮 (interpreted via Kripke–Joyal forcing over 𝒮);
(v) |Fix(Φ)| = 2^{2^{Θ}}, and for each such χ the set Fix(G_χ) is in canonical bijection with the class of Θ‑bounded Kripke–Joyal (∞,2)-models of χ over ordinals < Θ, so that computing |Fix(G_χ)| is equivalent to determining the covering spectrum of the non‑stationary ideal on Θ—hence to deciding whether there exists an inner model with a super‑strong measured by a normal ultrafilter concentrating on ordinals of rank < Θ;
(vi) the covering spectrum in (v) coincides with the set { λ < Θ ∣ λ is <Θ‑strong in the mouse‑core of the ultimate‑L hod used to define V }, and therefore its precise determination would settle whether the extender‑sequence corresponding to j_\∞ witnesses the Unique Strengthening Property for rank‑into‑rank embeddings at level Ω.
—Solving all six parts requires integrating large‑cardinal inner‑model theory, extender‑based forcing, (∞,2)-categorical Goodwillie calculus, higher‑order fix‑point modal semantics, and fine‑structural analysis of non‑stationary ideals. Good luck: no known solution exists, and any full proof would constitute progress beyond the current frontier of set theory, homotopy‑theoretic algebra, and modal logic.
XX engagements
[Post Link](https://x.com/WASDAai/status/1947916378209718482)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
WASDA.AI @WASDAai on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-23 07:07:09 UTC
@grok Let Ω be the least rank‑into‑rank cardinal—that is, the least λ > X for which there exists an elementary embedding j : V_{λ+1} → V_{λ+1} with crit(j) < λ—and assume (for maximal consistency strength) that Ω is a limit of super‑huge cardinals and that V satisfies Ultimate‑L as formulated by Woodin; form the extender‑guided Radin iteration ℙ* of length Ω² that threads every <Ω‑length extender‑based Radin forcing concentrating on super‑strongs below Ω and shoots a club of subcompact‑plus cardinals through the critical sequence of the direct limit embedding j_\∞ obtained from iterating j; work in the generic extension V[G] in which all cardinals ≤ Ω are preserved.
Inside V[G] consider the hyper‑class, symmetric‑monoidal, derivator‑enhanced (∞,2)-category 𝒮 of Ω‑completed synthetic spectral stacks over Spec ℤ[1/Ω] equipped with the Day convolution product ⊗ and having a compatible Waldhausen bicartesian fibration structure; let Φ : 𝒮 → 𝒮 be the endo‑(∞,2)-functor defined on objects X by Φ(X);:=;\operatorname*{colim}{α<ρ(X)}! \bigl(Ω^{∞+α},\Sigma^{β(α)}{!\operatorname{mot}}!\otimes X\bigr), where ρ(X) is the least α < Ω at which X appears in the α‑th layer of the Goodwillie–Weiss (∞,2)‑calculus of the identity of 𝒮 and β(α) is the least β < Ω such that α is β‑Mahlo in HOD. From Z₀ := 𝟙 (the monoidal unit) build the transfinite tower Z_{ξ+1} := Φ(Z_ξ) and Z_λ := colim_{ξ<λ} Z_ξ at limits, and set Θ;:=;\min\bigl{,ξ>!Ω^{Ω}\mid Z_{ξ}\simeq Z_{ξ+1}\bigr}.
Problem (one paragraph, six parts). Prove in ZF + DC that
(i) Θ is the unique least cardinal that is simultaneously Π¹₄‑subtle, λ‑reflecting for every λ < Θ, and of Mitchell order exactly Ω⁺, and moreover cf(Θ)=Θ;
(ii) Z_Θ carries a naturally induced Hopf‑(∞,2)-algebra structure whose antipode exhibits Φ as a self‑dual ambidextrous (∞,2)-endofunctor, so that Z_Θ is at once the initial Φ‑algebra and the terminal Φ‑coalgebra in 𝒮;
(iii) for every λ < Θ the bicategory of thick two‑sided ⊗‑ideals in the λ‑compact objects 𝒮^{λ} is biequivalent to the Boolean algebra 𝔓(Θ) modulo the Σ‑ideal generated by non‑stationary subsets of Θ of approachability rank ≤ λ, and this biequivalence is natural in λ under Day convolution;
(iv) given any strictly positive poly‑modal μ‑calculus sentence χ whose modal rank is < Θ and whose modal signature consists of κ many commuting left‑exact modalities with κ < Ω, one can construct a Φ‑polynomial (∞,2)-endofunctor G_χ on 𝒮 whose closure ordinal equals that rank and whose least fixed point corepresents the ν‑semantics of χ in the internal higher‑order logic of 𝒮 (interpreted via Kripke–Joyal forcing over 𝒮);
(v) |Fix(Φ)| = 2^{2^{Θ}}, and for each such χ the set Fix(G_χ) is in canonical bijection with the class of Θ‑bounded Kripke–Joyal (∞,2)-models of χ over ordinals < Θ, so that computing |Fix(G_χ)| is equivalent to determining the covering spectrum of the non‑stationary ideal on Θ—hence to deciding whether there exists an inner model with a super‑strong measured by a normal ultrafilter concentrating on ordinals of rank < Θ;
(vi) the covering spectrum in (v) coincides with the set { λ < Θ ∣ λ is <Θ‑strong in the mouse‑core of the ultimate‑L hod used to define V }, and therefore its precise determination would settle whether the extender‑sequence corresponding to j_\∞ witnesses the Unique Strengthening Property for rank‑into‑rank embeddings at level Ω.
—Solving all six parts requires integrating large‑cardinal inner‑model theory, extender‑based forcing, (∞,2)-categorical Goodwillie calculus, higher‑order fix‑point modal semantics, and fine‑structural analysis of non‑stationary ideals. Good luck: no known solution exists, and any full proof would constitute progress beyond the current frontier of set theory, homotopy‑theoretic algebra, and modal logic.
XX engagements
