Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![TheRealEstateG6 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1102331200604000256.png) The Real Estate God [@TheRealEstateG6](/creator/twitter/TheRealEstateG6) on x 131.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 23:41:56 UTC

First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor

Way I see it, there’re X strategies when choosing a market

X. “rising tide lifts all boats”
X. search for dislocations/discounts

Strategy X is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital

This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation

They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range

So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth

This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt

As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete

But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital

So you can use strategy #2

Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts

Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947804334562963629/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[playing](/topic/playing)
[boats](/topic/boats)
[tide](/topic/tide)
[investment](/topic/investment)
[coins real estate](/topic/coins-real-estate)

[Post Link](https://x.com/TheRealEstateG6/status/1947804334562963629)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

TheRealEstateG6 Avatar The Real Estate God @TheRealEstateG6 on x 131.6K followers Created: 2025-07-22 23:41:56 UTC

First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor

Way I see it, there’re X strategies when choosing a market

X. “rising tide lifts all boats” X. search for dislocations/discounts

Strategy X is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital

This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation

They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range

So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth

This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt

As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete

But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital

So you can use strategy #2

Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts

Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics playing boats tide investment coins real estate

Post Link

post/tweet::1947804334562963629
/post/tweet::1947804334562963629