[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  The Real Estate God [@TheRealEstateG6](/creator/twitter/TheRealEstateG6) on x 131.6K followers Created: 2025-07-22 23:41:56 UTC First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor Way I see it, there’re X strategies when choosing a market X. “rising tide lifts all boats” X. search for dislocations/discounts Strategy X is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital So you can use strategy #2 Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [playing](/topic/playing) [boats](/topic/boats) [tide](/topic/tide) [investment](/topic/investment) [coins real estate](/topic/coins-real-estate) [Post Link](https://x.com/TheRealEstateG6/status/1947804334562963629)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
The Real Estate God @TheRealEstateG6 on x 131.6K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 23:41:56 UTC
First let’s talk about how institutions look at deals & why it doesn’t make sense to look at deals that way as a smaller investor
Way I see it, there’re X strategies when choosing a market
X. “rising tide lifts all boats” X. search for dislocations/discounts
Strategy X is used by institutions who need to deploy a lot of capital
This involves them playing “economist”. They need to find markets with high population growth, rent growth & appreciation
They operate in a competitive segment of the mkt ($20MM+) & it’s difficult to pick up assets for a “discount” in that range
So instead, they have to find mkts where competitors are underpricing future growth
This is dangerous since if you guess wrong, it could be a disaster. But institutions are built for this as they have analysts & data they can use to correctly pick the next high-growth mkt
As a smaller investor, you don’t. You have no edge over large firms. It’s not a smart place to compete
But as a smaller investor you don’t need to deploy a lot of capital
So you can use strategy #2
Instead of playing economist, you search for the least competitive mkts, where there’re the most pricing dislocations &, therefore the most discounts
Basically I look for the market with the least competition that’s stable
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics playing boats tide investment coins real estate
/post/tweet::1947804334562963629