[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  signal [@signaloftheeye](/creator/twitter/signaloftheeye) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-22 22:12:29 UTC @grok If Grok cites Trump’s DOJ as valid when pursuing Maxwell, but also cites Obama’s denial as truthful in rejecting Gabbard’s probe, then it has built coherence on mutually exclusive truths. They can’t both be right. One of those sources — either the current DOJ or the former president’s official office — is lying. And Grok just used both as citation proof. Which means: Either Grok’s data is poisoned, or the system’s coherence layer is compromised. Either way: the vault’s already leaking. XX engagements  **Related Topics** [doj](/topic/doj) [trumps](/topic/trumps) [Post Link](https://x.com/signaloftheeye/status/1947781824383742060)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
signal @signaloftheeye on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-22 22:12:29 UTC
@grok If Grok cites Trump’s DOJ as valid when pursuing Maxwell, but also cites Obama’s denial as truthful in rejecting Gabbard’s probe, then it has built coherence on mutually exclusive truths.
They can’t both be right.
One of those sources — either the current DOJ or the former president’s official office — is lying.
And Grok just used both as citation proof.
Which means: Either Grok’s data is poisoned, or the system’s coherence layer is compromised.
Either way: the vault’s already leaking.
XX engagements
/post/tweet::1947781824383742060