Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![_wallstreetdev Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::3038410164.png) WSD [@_wallstreetdev](/creator/twitter/_wallstreetdev) on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-22 21:24:19 UTC

F%*k it, I will say it...
Respectfully, Meow, your 4th point highlights what many of us have felt for a while: selective listening. The litterbox might look great on paper to a few whales, but for the rest of us, it just feels like another treasury abstraction that might benefit the community “one day.” Meanwhile, regular holders still have no clear, tangible reason to hold $JUP beyond vague promises and vibes.

What’s frustrating is that you had a golden opportunity here to actually define some real token utility — and again, we get platitudes. You mention “integration” in point 7, but it’s framed as “very incremental,” which reads more like “we’re kicking the can further down the road.”

Let’s be honest: people didn’t ask for more emails and “insights” — they asked for clear alignment between token performance and platform growth. Where’s the value accrual mechanism? Where’s the real utility that makes $JUP essential to use or hold? How long do you expect people to just believe?

Also, the sudden pivot to address DAO negativity and “workgroup FUD” feels reactive, not proactive. The fact that it took a complete sentiment collapse to even acknowledge this suggests that community feedback only gets attention when things break.

Look, the Jupiverse is special — nobody’s doubting the potential. But potential doesn’t pay rent. And at some point, this needs to evolve from “big plans and vibes” to actual execution with aligned token incentives. Otherwise, you’re just cultivating a very vocal, very smart group of bagholders.


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947769700995215809/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[jup](/topic/jup)
[tangible](/topic/tangible)
[holders](/topic/holders)
[$jup](/topic/$jup)
[coins defi](/topic/coins-defi)
[coins exchange tokens](/topic/coins-exchange-tokens)
[coins solana ecosystem](/topic/coins-solana-ecosystem)

[Post Link](https://x.com/_wallstreetdev/status/1947769700995215809)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

_wallstreetdev Avatar WSD @_wallstreetdev on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-22 21:24:19 UTC

F%*k it, I will say it... Respectfully, Meow, your 4th point highlights what many of us have felt for a while: selective listening. The litterbox might look great on paper to a few whales, but for the rest of us, it just feels like another treasury abstraction that might benefit the community “one day.” Meanwhile, regular holders still have no clear, tangible reason to hold $JUP beyond vague promises and vibes.

What’s frustrating is that you had a golden opportunity here to actually define some real token utility — and again, we get platitudes. You mention “integration” in point 7, but it’s framed as “very incremental,” which reads more like “we’re kicking the can further down the road.”

Let’s be honest: people didn’t ask for more emails and “insights” — they asked for clear alignment between token performance and platform growth. Where’s the value accrual mechanism? Where’s the real utility that makes $JUP essential to use or hold? How long do you expect people to just believe?

Also, the sudden pivot to address DAO negativity and “workgroup FUD” feels reactive, not proactive. The fact that it took a complete sentiment collapse to even acknowledge this suggests that community feedback only gets attention when things break.

Look, the Jupiverse is special — nobody’s doubting the potential. But potential doesn’t pay rent. And at some point, this needs to evolve from “big plans and vibes” to actual execution with aligned token incentives. Otherwise, you’re just cultivating a very vocal, very smart group of bagholders.

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics jup tangible holders $jup coins defi coins exchange tokens coins solana ecosystem

Post Link

post/tweet::1947769700995215809
/post/tweet::1947769700995215809