Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Invst_Informant Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1427511218303119377.png) Danny Marques | Investing Informant 📊📈 [@Invst_Informant](/creator/twitter/Invst_Informant) on x 18.1K followers
Created: 2025-07-22 19:29:44 UTC

I'd look a little deeper and you'll see that this is theologically and historically incorrect

The Apostles taught through oral tradition as much as written letters. Paul himself says in X Thessalonians 2:15 “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter” 

Both oral and written transmission are authoritative 

Also scripture was not yet fully written or canonized during the Apostolic age. The New Testament as we know it was not compiled until the late 4th century, officially recognized in the Synod of Rome (382 AD), Councils of Hippo (393 AD), and Carthage (397 and XXX AD)

How could the Apostles rely solely on a body of texts that did not yet fully exist?

Also Paul refers to the Church as “the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15) not Scripture alone.

The authority to interpret Scripture was never privatized it was entrusted to the Apostolic Church, and later to their successors, the bishops, in communion with the Bishop of Rome.


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1947740865742442731/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[investment](/topic/investment)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Invst_Informant/status/1947740865742442731)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

Invst_Informant Avatar Danny Marques | Investing Informant 📊📈 @Invst_Informant on x 18.1K followers Created: 2025-07-22 19:29:44 UTC

I'd look a little deeper and you'll see that this is theologically and historically incorrect

The Apostles taught through oral tradition as much as written letters. Paul himself says in X Thessalonians 2:15 “So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter”

Both oral and written transmission are authoritative

Also scripture was not yet fully written or canonized during the Apostolic age. The New Testament as we know it was not compiled until the late 4th century, officially recognized in the Synod of Rome (382 AD), Councils of Hippo (393 AD), and Carthage (397 and XXX AD)

How could the Apostles rely solely on a body of texts that did not yet fully exist?

Also Paul refers to the Church as “the pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15) not Scripture alone.

The authority to interpret Scripture was never privatized it was entrusted to the Apostolic Church, and later to their successors, the bishops, in communion with the Bishop of Rome.

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics investment

Post Link

post/tweet::1947740865742442731
/post/tweet::1947740865742442731